this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025

361 points (96.2% liked)

Asklemmy

asklemmy@lemmy.ml

55,659 readers

4,491 active

378 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~~Icon~~ by ~~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~~

founded 7 years ago

moderators

mekhos@lemmy.ml

14specks@lemmy.ml

DAE feel like DuckDuckGo is now just as good as google for the vast majority of searches? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 years ago by doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

163 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Not because DDG got better, but just because google got worse.

google is still better for site-specific searches, and google scholar still has minimal AI slop

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] limoncia@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I found Qwant to be a bit better, but yeah. Google got so much worse over last few years

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] ScoreDivision@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I also use Qwant but it's noticeably slower for me. Do you find the same?

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] limoncia@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Yes, it responds slower but I don't really mind it. Like it's not significantly slower from others in my case.

parent