this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
70 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38168 readers
349 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Great. Just great.

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yay, fucking looser spending tax payer money on another of his looser scams

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

He's looser from all of the anal he's taking from Musk and Putin.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago

You win the internet today.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 13 hours ago

So he's going to do the same thing he did to his fanboys to the government? Oh good. Can we impeach this guy yet?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 17 hours ago

The government as bagholder of last resort

[–] [email protected] 61 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

as if forcing everyones retirement into the practically unregulated stock market wasnt already the worst gamble in american history... lets make our reserve even less stable.

awesome. super genius moves here. congress isnt asleep at the wheel, theyre comatose. they might as well not exist.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

If it's any comfort, he's merely planning to take all of the crypto the government has confiscated and merely put it all into one account and do nothing with it.

It's like taking all the small change from the various couches of your house and putting it all into one water jug and forgetting that it's in the corner.

So basically useless, like the half (that isn't destructive) of stuff he does.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

the piece that makes me nervous is the selling off of government owned properties. its one of the most valuable and stable assets the government owns and hes attempting to sell it off.. some of it we would then have to lease from private owners.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Well, that's the other half - destroy democracy and liquidate its assets like a failed casino.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago

Wouldn't it be nice if that sarcasm didn't reflect reality?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't that a classic corporate raid technique? Sell the company's assets to you or an organization you control, then lease them back to the original owners.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

didn't that crush red lobster recently?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago

Yea turns out the new property management company has its own profit driven motives, and will only push leases higher and higher...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

Bold statement coming from someone with a Chili in their name.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Congress has made it explicitly clear that they serve to rubber stamp anything and everything Trump signs as an EO. They work for and serve the executive office only

[–] [email protected] 18 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

who needs checks and balances when you support a dictator? the constitution is toilet paper to these people.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 17 hours ago

You need checks to send money from the government to the oligarchs, and balances to know how much money they earned. So yes, checks and balances are fundamental and necessary.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
  • The temporarily slim majority in congress has...

Ftfy? I hope?!? Please tell me this isn't forever.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

This wishful thinking Americans have that some magical saviour of democracy is going to appear to save them is ridiculous and sad for the rest of the world looking at this forest fire.

If you’re an American, go fix your fucking country. You have constitutional amendments for this exact scenario.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You have constitutional amendments for this exact scenario.

WTF does this actually mean? You do realize that constitutional amendments require a 2/3rds majority, right?

And what the hell amendment are you suggesting?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago

If you as an American need the first few amendments spelled out for you then I don’t really know what to tell you. No idea why you’re on about 2/3 majority. It’s not even relevant to my comment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

We do, but we don't have two-thirds of both houses of Congress ready to fix this mess, let alone 38 statehouses to ratify. The clusterfuck will continue apace.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This is wild. I’m referring to the amendments in your constitution in the event of tyranny. Even here in your comment and the other’s, you’re waiting for congress or your senate or whatever part of your government to save you.

No one is coming to save you. Save yourselves. You have a constitutional amendment for this exact moment in time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I get that you don't live here, but there's nothing like a national initiative process for amendments. That you would like there to be reflects a likely majority view of the voter base, but this does not make it so.

If you're referring to the 14th, that was shredded already. The Constitution is irrelevant to the junta, as juntas are wont to do. Voting harder in a mythical election that can't happen is simply not an option.

I would encourage you to know about the U.S. Constitution before spouting off about it. I don't wander into Canadian politics because I don't know how it works and can admit that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Gosh it’s truly incredible. Neither of those amendments were what was referring to but I’m not wasting my time anymore. Enjoy your new country! Y’all have absolutely earned it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I have thick enough skin to usually let comments like this slide, but if you believe treating Beehaw users like this is appropriate, this may not be a good forum for participation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I believe the other user was trying to avoid explicitly stating that Americans need to use the powers given them by the second amendment to directly take back their country, without engaging in the existing (apparently ineffectual) political processes.

Apparently I'm avoiding saying it directly too, perhaps I don't want to be directly encouraging anything.

Anyways, their intent seemed very obvious to me from their first comment (so I can see where their frustration came from), but I'm not educated enough in the US political system to be distracted by the details of 2/3rds majorities etc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah that was a wild read. Old mate was fairly clear i thought too

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

There are two problems here, fitting for the Second.

First, the people stocked with ammo are the ones thrilled that we're in the Fourth Reich. Second, any sort of widespread uprising will let use of the Insurrection Act sail through any hurdles, and now the military is being used internally.

The Constitution is not in play at this point. Second is the only thing being defended by the junta.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Oh, certainly. And the military has much better weapons (and training) than most 2A advocates.

My personal thoughts are that if even 5% of the population of large cities stood up and (even unarmed) said "no, you're not going to destroy the country" that would have a significant impact.

(for residents in the DC metro area, that would be over 300,000 people, which you've exceeded in past protests - across the country if you could hit the 5% (17 million) protest target, you would certainly have a significant impact)

I know there's a 50501 movement. I don't know the size of it, (long way to go) but I think they're still gaining momentum.

Long story short though, I really feel like this isn't something that can be fixed by legislation or voting. That can help later, and can help support outside movements, but the people need to act, not just the politicians.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 20 hours ago

I mean, have you seen how old most of them are?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

So what's this mean?

He'll take US Tax Dollars and put them in Crypto?

Sounds like a great way to bankrupt your entire country back into the stone age.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

No. In fact it explicitly doesn’t allow that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

They're using a bullshit slight-of-hand to claim they're not spending government money on it.

They're planning on using coins seized from criminals. But normally those coins would be sold, and the proceeds from that sale would go to the US Treasury. Instead, they're going to seize them and just hold onto them.

It's the same thing. Whether you spend government money to purchase coins and hold them, or you simply hold seize coins, both of these options result in the same increase in the US national debt.

And ultimately it is simply a method of propping up the crypto bubble. They want the US government to be the ultimate "diamond hands" hoarder of crypto. Every time some dark web drug site gets shut down, any coins they hold will be thrown into a government vault, never to be seen again. This effectively removes them from circulation, decreasing the supply, and forcing crypto prices higher. This is taking billions from the Treasury to prop up the crypto market.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Gonna be the most epic rugpull of all time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

In 3... 2...1...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 19 hours ago

That crypto reserve is a load of old cobblers if I ever saw one. The government is not buying or planning or whatever… they just don’t do anything with the stack they already have, thanks to Biden I guess? And I guess they won’t be chasing many new frauds and rug pullers anymore, with all the crypto broligarch shit they are pulling.