this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
188 points (98.5% liked)

politics

21001 readers
3473 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fired federal workers who are worried about losing their homes ask not to be quoted by name. University presidents fearing that millions of dollars in federal funding could disappear are holding their fire. Chief executives alarmed by tariffs that could hurt their businesses are on mute.

Even longtime Republican hawks on Capitol Hill, stunned by President Trump’s revisionist history that Ukraine is to blame for its invasion by Russia, and his Oval Office blowup at President Volodymyr Zelensky, have either muzzled themselves, tiptoed up to criticism without naming Mr. Trump or completely reversed their positions.

More than six weeks into the second Trump administration, there is a chill spreading over political debate in Washington and beyond.

People on both sides of the aisle who would normally be part of the public dialogue about the big issues of the day say they are intimidated by the prospect of online attacks from Mr. Trump and Elon Musk, concerned about harm to their companies and frightened for the safety of their families. Politicians fear banishment by a party remade in Mr. Trump’s image and the prospect of primary opponents financed by Mr. Musk, the president’s all-powerful partner and the world’s richest man.

MBFC
Archive

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

The irony of this coming from the NYT, who had to both-sides us right into this shit, not once, but TWICE.

Because Hillary and Kamala would have been just as bad, BidenSoOld and something something Gaza. 🙄

JFC.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Hey, NYT, nice way to frame what you've been doing since twenty-fucking-fifteen!

Maybe if any of the US media had ever had any fucking balls (or weren't owned by oligarchs) we wouldn't be at this point.

This is what media consolidation gets you. Thanks Bill Clinton and US congress for the Telecommunications Act of 1996 which kicked off this media consolidation frenzy.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

Fuck both Clintons. They enabled this mess to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

They fear economic retribution. Fuck those cowards.

Trading your lives for their profits.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

Well take a look at our leadership.

We currently have Hakeem Jeffries basically cowering in the corner like a little bitch and Chuck Schumer saying Jeffries should ask New York republicans to cooperate out of the kindness of their hearts because there's nothing he can do in the Senate.

And all we have is one guy trying to bring attention to the problem but everybody complaining that he's too old, and a minority woman that is deeply unpopular outside of her home district and nobody wants to listen to because she's a minority woman, while the rest of the party is trying to appease the Republicans. I feel like we've been here before.......

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not us here at Lemmy. Fuck Trump. Someone get me in front of his face so I can say it with gusto and a little bit of spit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Fuck you I won't do what you tell me

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

This reads like it's supposed to chill the readers, not tell them who is starting to shut up and take it.

Anyone else notice that? Or am I hallucinating