The whole "most startups lose a lot of money and fail, but some will be wildly successful" model is kind of rotten. Especially when the "wild success " often means breaking laws or becoming consumer hostile.
this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
38155 readers
255 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Any time someone in a propaganda article says "use AI or get left behind" I just sorta lean back, look at the state of things. It isn't even a hopeful grift. Reminds me of false prophets doing tent revivals in the colonies, but they're not offering heaven, they're pretending there will be a world left that's worth being rich in.
using natural language and instincts to create code.
After decades of seeing job offers like "Idea guy, looks for technological partner to write code for startup"... I can't but smirk at the vision of an "idea guy" having an LLM write some code, then convincing some investors to finance the sham.
This will be the new COBOL, a natural language any businessman can write by themselves 🤭
if any of these startups succeed, my condolences to the engineers who get hired afterwards and are stuck bugfixing
This is any successful startup - you don't succeed by making a perfect product, you succeed by making a buggy mess that's enough to convince both investors and more importantly customers that there's potential... That means you need to rebuild from scratch in years 2-4 anyway, so frankly for the engineers who are coming in then, there's little to no difference
I think there is a difference. Because software is so flexible and quick to build, it's orders of magnitude easier to build something known and understood.
A promising startup with its systems in a knot, but their initial team is still on retainer? Brains can be picked, abstraction boundaries placed, surgical rewrites deployed. Despite the mess, they still understand it, and development can expand.
It remains to be seen if AI-generated code is recoverable, if any existing strategies can be applied so humans can contribute, or if the company is forever beholden to AI providers to release a better AI to manage/improve what they've already got.
YuckCombinator
WankerNews