top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 87 points 2 years ago (33 children)

Can I be nit-picky here for a second?

If you're genetically modifying an elephant for cold tolerance and fur growth, you're not "bring a mammoth back from extinction", you're creating a furry elephant. It may look somewhat like a mammoth, but genetically it's not a mammoth at all.

It's like saying you can genetically modify a homo-sapien to have a pronounced brow ridge and a hairier back and say that you've brought the neandertal back from extinction. No you haven't, you've just designed a human who looks different.

  • source
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago

    Well, the goal isn't to just create woolly mammoth-lile creatures by copying characteristics. The goal is to recreate the genome from what genome data we have into a living creature.

    It's not like they are trying to create a sweded version, but take a creature that is already close and change the genes to match.

    At least, that's how I understood it based on the article.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    And next you’ll say that genetically-modified ears aren’t enough to make catgirls real either 😩

    Can we let this one go? Not for science, not for accuracy, but for the prospect of having catgirls in our lifetimes, at least?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (30 replies)
    [–] 52 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Everything weird about this aside... Those mice are fucking adorable.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Kind of a dick move to bring an animal from the Ice Age, back to experience global warming.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    mouse sized woolly mammoth would be pretty fucking cool.

    imagine the sound when he toots his little trunk.

    could store him in the fridge.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    This was wise. They had to create the woolly mice so that when they create the woolly mammoths, they can woolly control them.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago

    They do look extremely cute though.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    Is this how we get tribbles?

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    The 15ft tall 8,000 pound mouse was last seen rampaging in the downtown area. OK that's what I wanted the article to say.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    new Pokémon just dropped?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    I am skeptical of all articles with "scientists" in the title... but those mice are really cute. 😙

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    But no little tiny tusks? No trunk? Lame. Is it so wrong to want a tiny mammoth I can hold in one hand?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Real talk? Yes. Miniaturization of animals does not do good things for their health, in general. The systems of animal bodies are finely tuned by natural selection, and mucking with that is how you get dogs that can't breathe because their nose has been bred into the approximate shape of a squished aluminum can. Homeostasis is easy to throw off long-term when you play around with the square-cube law.

    See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allometry#Physiological_scaling

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    Oh my god I want one so bad

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This means they’re gonna make wooly elephants and try to make us call them woolly mammoths.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    How many butts do the mice have?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Got the woolly m, just need a few more letters.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Why? How about focusing on preventing more extinctions instead of some Jurassic Park bullshit.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    We already know how to prevent more extinctions. Better environmental laws, more green spaces, better conservation efforts, less suburban sprawl, etc. You know, things that will never happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    gotta start somewhere

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Ever since I was a kid I've always been hyped about the idea of them bringing back the mammoth. Been hearing about it my whole life...

    But I have to ask... Why are we trying to, exactly? I mean, the planet's heating up. why are we trying to reintroduce a woolly mammoth? It's one thing if they're talking about using actual mammoth DNA and cloning it, but that article was talking about specifically just turning on some genes that cause fur and cold tolerance... What is the point of just making furry elephants at this point? Where are we sticking them, and why are we sticking them there? Is there some ecological niche that needs filling? Are we going to attempt to populate Antarctica (and hope it stays cold enough for that?) with hirsute pachyderms?

    How about a different plan? As much as I have been excited woolly mammoths my entire life, let's try something a little different. Let's shrink the elephants we have, and introduce them into North America. Elephants the size of bison, roaming the continent. You can still make them cold tolerant, to handle winters, and give em some fur if you want. But the elephants we have are going extinct, and you're worrying about bringing back something else. How about we save what we have? Let them roam and graze Europe and North America, replacing the Aurochs and the bison. God knows we're not going to stop eating anything too cow like, so wild bison is basically right out. Let's let the elephant fill these niches, and save the species. They're too fucking smart to let die. Elephants got fucking religion, y'all. We cannot let them die.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Reintroducing mammoths in the arctic could potentially help reduce the climate change.

    There is a scientist in Siberia who built the Pleistocene Park. An area where he reintroduced a lot of large herbivores and studied their impact. He's saying that boreal forest have a very low biodiversity compared to mammoth steppes. The steppes have way more animals, are stocking way more carbon in the soil and prevent methane leaks by keeping the permafrost frozen due to the low albedo of the biome.

    The problem is that with the mammoths are indispensable to maintain the steppes. They are the only animal big enough to clear up trees, without them the forest is taking over and all the ecosystem of the steppes disappear.

    So (according to this scientist), resurrecting the mammoth could revive a whole ecosystem, with a very rich biodiversity and that could have a give impact on the climate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So there is a good reason, then? I've googled it before, and the best answers I've gotten are basically "cause MAMMOTHS!"

    If that's the case and there's a good reason, then hell yeah, do whatever we can to prevent climate collapse!

    But also, give me small elephants, please? Especially if they can manage Chihuahua sized elephants. I would have so many! And I would make sure they always have a clear view of the moon goddess they worship

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Don’t let me harsh your vibe here, but are you sure about the moon thing? https://www.iflscience.com/the-internet-appears-to-believe-elephants-worship-the-moon-58666

    I’m down with chihuahua-sized elephants, though, don’t get me wrong here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "We were like this close" 🤏

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I'd like to buy a vowel. "U!"

    Damnit!

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›