this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
304 points (99.4% liked)

politics

20394 readers
3976 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Trump administration mistakenly fired over 300 National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) employees, only to reverse course after realizing their roles in overseeing the U.S. nuclear arsenal.

The NNSA is housed under the Department of Energy, which is tasked with researching and oversight of nuclear power and nuclear weapons, as well as energy production in general.

The firings were part of a broader purge led by Trump and Elon Musk, which has sparked lawsuits.

Experts warn that disruptions at NNSA threaten national security.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 87 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

idiots fucking is how we got to these fucking idiots destroying the government.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 week ago

"Accidentally" weakened America for Russias benefit.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You may ask yourself, "What is that beautiful house?" You may ask yourself, "Where does that highway go to?" And you may ask yourself, "Am I right, am I wrong?" And you may say to yourself, "My God, what have I done?"

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

But trust me on the sunscreen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

This ain't no party, this ain't no disco...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You may ask yourself “what happened to the nuclear arsenal?”

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Into the blue again, after the money's gone.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

@MicroWave Next week: President mistakenly fires President.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

No take backs!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

President Musk fired President Trump? Or the other way around?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

These are the worst people.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

These news came up on my notifications earlier as "Trump administration fired nuclear..." and gave me a minor heart attack

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Come on even Trump won't do that without warning. Not that he wouldn't do it period, but we'd see some relevant posturing first. I think.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

The Bar is low. I'm waiting for him to nuke the border.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Musk yells "You're fired" in a crowded theatre... now hundreds are jobless.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

So much efficiency!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Like x, let's now hire them back for 3x their old package. Efficiency at its best.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can we use the established media convention and just say "America fires nuclear arsenal staff"? Was this going to be the Biden administration in exile?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Since when has that ever been established media convention? Besides, the article clearly states these are decisions coming from Trump despite the vehement opposition from the majority of the government hierarchy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because when dangerous states do things regarded as threatening, you're supposed to just name the country. Right?

Hey sometimes it even applies to private companies

What's different about America doing things?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

All of your examples are nations interacting with other nations. The reference to the country name instead of leader is because the reader has no control over the leadership of a foreign nation - it’s an irrelevant detail to them.

When it’s an internal issue, eg. America causing problems in America, news should name the person who ordered it. This better informs the population of that detail, and theoretically arms them to make better choices while voting.

Surely you see the difference here, right?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah yes. Those are 7000 internal nuclear missiles, for internal use. Phew, I was worried the rest of the world might be as affected by America's actions as much as we were by China's mirroring of open source github repos.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

you missed the point by thi ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... s much.