This is the way. Elon Musk loves to lie about his IQ and pretend he’s smarter than he is. Trump’s favorite insult is ‘low IQ’. Find something that digs into their skin and make them throw a tantrum.
this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
537 points (98.9% liked)
politics
19776 readers
3562 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Musk is pretty normal for billionaires. Completely detached from reality, drunk on power and his own ego, convinced his every idea is divine inspiration, except the god is him.
I bet that on top of wanting to be sure nothing that fElon is doing is disrupted or slowed down in any way, the qons didn't allow fElon to be brought in for questioning, because they don't want everyone to realize just how fucking stupid he really is.
fElon is a weird guy, but also not even half as intelligent as the carefully crafted myth he's made for himself.
Can you imagine the dipshit being grilled by members of Congress? The asshat wouldn't be able to play edgy edgelord dooooosssshbro in that venue. He'd just look like the childish idiot that he totally is. And the cons don't want to see the spell broken when it comes to the ridiculous myth of fElon.
Please, infamous hacker 4chan, come get your boy.
he has issues
"The enemy is a helpless mind bogglingly stupid moron and, at the same time, a genius of cunning, destruction and evil strategy, capable of undermining every one of our moves and vigilant of our every step"
The stunlock continues at pace
Can AOC run for president in the next election? Or is there some DNC blood oath that only shitty candidates can run?
Only neoliberals can run
Yeah, Americans are notoriously love intelligent women, especially if they're not white.
I honestly think she has a real chance, TBH, although I can see the two cases where misogyny helped donvict into office....
I'm sure the cons and "liberal media" would do everything possible to paint her as the second coming of Karl Marx, though...even if most Americans actually agree with her policy positions on nearly everything, when you poll people on the issues.
But many Americans still think that Hillary (!) is some kind of radical leftist. Or that Obama is. Or that Biden is, or Kamala....after a while, trying to paint every single candidate as a Deep State radical Marxist fascist Communist socialist globalist (and every other stupid term they use with zero understanding of words) is going to wear off but still she has a HOOHAA is not white, so....
In a slightly saner world she would be nobrainer. Smart, young, active, has enormous support base. In current US political climate being smart and young is a disadvantage and being a woman is a political suicide, unless you're very, very conservative.
being smart and young is a disadvantage
I'm not so sure, Obama overcame being Bla, 2x, and part of that was due to him being smart (and young), I'm sure.
Let's run another old white moderate
Dems won the election last time they did that.
If they can actually win, then: fuck yeah.
I for some inexplicable reason feel optimistic about this. I think large majority wouldn't mind as long as she had popular platform.
If she had polulist conservative platform, sure, they will vote conservative anyway, and non-sexist part of the undecided could be swayed. With left leaning however, no chance. Her core base don't vote so they will fall off, a bunch of left leaning people prefer to be outraged to solutions so they will not vote because she will check 99 boxes out of 100 and for those people it might as well be satan incarnate, and a bunch of centrists will not vote for no woman something something sandwich. The rest are racists and will be outraged that a minority has an audacity to talk.
Mhmmm. Unfortunately most of these Americans aren’t USianb.
Yea she could, but pelosi will never let her pass. As long as pelosi and her "democrats" friends are around the dnc you won't see any bernie or aoc in control or any action leaning left.
The bitch is swimming in money since trump got elected.
https://finbold.com/nancy-pelosi-is-up-90-already-on-her-newest-stock-bet/
Pelosi etf is better than the sp500 🤣🤣
Its not a blood oath. They're a party on the center right. She's too far left for them.
"Too far left" for the Dems, yet popular with the so called "centrists". There is a lesson in there somewhere.
load more comments
(1 replies)
He's a Nazi. Therefore, I couldn't care less about him at all.
If only it could work like that.
It works like that. It's very simple to me.
to me
Unfortunately, Nazis don't have a habit of leaving others be. As that famous saying goes about not having an interest in politics....politics ends up having an interest in you.
Musk is the personification of an idiot’s concept of a genius.
That's why trump and maga have so much faith in him.
Yep. Weirdly, they thought EVs were going to make them gay, but now they loooooove fElon. Probably because they now realize he's maybe just as stupid as donvict.
In my job I've dealt with a number of multi-millionaires and I'm usually struck by just how dumb and incompetent they are.
The economy does not reward hard work or intelligence, it rewards hubris and megalomania.
Those qualities occasionally help people break through to wealth, but mostly the economy rewards already being rich. Having rich parents is how you become rich.
"But I have no intelligence but plenty of hubris with aspirations of megalomania" - The Average American.
*while wearing a cross
FTFY
The funny thing is that as much hubris as some folks show, they have nothing on those that have it in them to get to multi-millionaire status.
You'll see someone so full of hubris and just talking out of their ass, but faced with a question or statement that derails their talk, even those people will kind of pause while their brain struggles with what the hell just happened, before carrying on generally still out of their ass, but they stammered for a bit to get back to that hubris.
Those that have the real hubris in them, don't even bat an eye. They don't even consider for a millisecond that information inconsistent with their world view is worth processing.
That's because the guy is a total fraud.
And always has been. He's a snake oil salesman who has never built a product someone wants to buy in his life. When his creativity is given room (aka the Cybertruck) it's overwhelmingly unsuccessful.
His start was in PayPal where he was just a money guy with stupid ideas that kept getting shot down. It's why he owns x.com he'd wanted to rebrand PayPal to X after the PayPal brand became well entrenched (which was an absolutely awful idea).
Actually he got his start selling some random website to Compaq in the middle of the "everyone throw their money at random websites" craze of the late 90s. So he was among the folks that won the dot-com lottery.
Then he took his winnings and rolled it into x.com, which was solidly on a trajectory to fail. He also wasn't allowed to be in charge.
Then after the merger with the much more popular PayPal (which could have done just fine without X.com ever coming along), Elon somehow got put in charge. He wanted to run the whole thing on Windows and it was a terrible terrible decision, with Paypal only being saved by kicking Elon out. Despite his role being just briefly in charge of it taking a wildly successful product and nearly destroying it only to be kicked out, people popularly credited him as 'the Paypal guy'.
So a guy got lucky and got $22 million from Compaq, and then $170 million from eBay because he still had a ton of PayPal stock despite no longer allowed to make decisions about it, and was carried by his "he was in charge of PayPal!" creds into Tesla, rewriting history of that company to declare himself a visionary founder rather than an early investor after the fact.
All the while the media sucking up to him hard, putting him in various cameos and references to portray him as a great mind of modern times, a real life Tony Stark. Feeding his ego while people close to him personally wrote about what a loser douchebag he was.
I've read most of this stuff; someone needs to do a 1.5-2 hour documentary on this guy and just what a total FRAUD he is, and how nearly everything most people think they "know" about fElon is just flat wrong.
Know of anything like that? Even a reputable thing on Youtube would be nice if someone summarized it all.
I'd like to point people at such resource(s) when I can. Even some lefties I know don't really quite understand just how fraudulent fElon is; they still think "he's a smart guy with good ideas and really pushed things forward for cars, etc."
load more comments
(5 replies)
His dock doesn't float, his wonder fuel is a disaster, his grasp of disruption theory is remedial at best, he didn't design the puzzle boxes, he didn't write the mystery and voila, it all adds up, the key to this entire case, and it was staring me right in the face. Like everyone in the world I assumed that Elon Musk was a complicated genius. But why?
I remember when he had a cameo on Big Bang Theory. I didn't know much about the guy, but at the time, just like most Americans, just had a vague notion of him being an "engineer" or something.
I got better.
The real answer is he oaid really good publicists to craft his image. The reality set in when he fired that team.
I've been hoping for a lengthy documentary on the guy that lays it ALL out, but when you go looking for some, you find dreck like this:
https://www.documentarytube.com/best-of/the-12-best-documentaries-about-elon-musk/
Looks like HBO is working on one, I hope it's not "balanced".
He can remove the mask and breathe the racist air deeply. He no longer has any fear.
load more comments
(3 replies)
view more: next ›