I'm kind of tired of Google sending me to the same 3 sites whenever I search for something. If not the same 3 sites it's 7 others that are so generic and boring I just feel they're useless. It's always makeuseof, androidauthority, or whatever other sites that have useful information but I rarely feel like they are saying anything new.

I want to see the results from those small blogs that are sometimes linked here. I can't come up with one since... you know that's why I'm asking how to find them, but you know them; they talk about nerdy stuff and are not afraid to get technical in whatever topic they discuss.

Also duckduckgo and qwant do the same thing. If there is a way to curate the results to better fit my needs then that'd be great too!

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 30 points 3 years ago (12 children)

been using kagi for some weeks and so far I am satisfied. It has a subscription cost after 300 searches though. But I guess getting rid of advertisements and tracking has a price

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

    Yeah, I've read around their documentation and they have a pretty compelling reason why one should prefer search engines where you directly pay to the search provider instead of relying on third parties such as advertisers to pay for your search usage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 3 years ago

    That actually looks really amazing! I really want more services to actually compel users to pay to support them, and make it a good decision to do so. I think this is the best suggestion so far. Thanks mate!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    My problem with Kagi is that they're still running at a loss and they think AI will be their savior.

    And their AI currently gives extremely wrong information but the devs think that's fine because the point of their AI is to be fast not accurate.

    I liked it as a search engine but at this point I can't see it surviving. If they raised the prices to where they lost a lot of customers and still can't get to positive numbers they aren't going to fix it by having AI give you wrong answers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 22 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Kagi is really good

    You need to pay for it but the free search allowance is enough for me.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    Kagi is the only one that consistently gives me much better results than google. The fact that it's not riddled with ads on the first page was a big incentive for me to give them some cash. It actually improved my productivity at work a whole lot. This actually made me think how shitty google has become when I was preferring results given by an error prone AI compared to just searching for it. Now with Kagi, I can actually find the stuff I'm looking for and only use AI in case I can't find it there for some reason. Totally worth the monthly subscription for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    I hit the threshold in a week, but it was because I got engaging results.

    Ideal search engine for falling into unexpected rabbit holes. It's scratches the itch of really exploring the web.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 20 points 3 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Use a SearXNG instance for free search. Kagi for paid. We've unfortunately hit the point where this is necessary.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    I did their one time trial and then moved to the lowest paid tier for a month. Other than not getting ads it didn't feel much more effective than some selective search-fu with duckduckgo. Any hints or tips on making it more effective? I can see the value proposition, but couldn't justify it with the actual results I was getting.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 15 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    I love duck duck go but theres one key thing I've been missing (or don't know how to do) with google you can just throw -word or -"a phrase" and it will ommit any result with them

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    You have to blacklist the AI farm sites though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    How do you that? They've been getting on my last nerve.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Firefox has uBlacklist, might be on Chrome too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Thanks for the recommendation. Looks like it only works with Google text search, and I don't use Google search.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    I'm running searxng on docker locally, and set that as my search engine on Firefox. It's been awesome! I will probably start a blog and post instructions... Adding the custom search engine into about:config was kinda difficult. Other web browsers should be easier.. (e.g. Vivaldi)

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    You can add search engines to Firefox in the address and search bar.

    Go to the site you want to add, click the address bar for the drop down to show, then there will be an icon for that site with a green plus to add it.

    If you use the search box it's even easier. If you're on the site the icon on the left will have the green plus symbol for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 12 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (6 children)

    There was a time before google's search engine, when all the previous attempts had not managed to become the dominant entry point for the web. During that time, we would find interesting web pages through people and/or specific interests. Then, google came, and for a time it was good (read like The Second Renaissance Part I story from animatrix). Ads and SEO were not everywhere yet, content mattered more than those two. So, while I came here to suggest what @bbbhltz@beehaw.org commented, when I read your post text I thought that maybe, at least for what we tend to constantly look for news, articles and discussions, we shouldn't constantly rely on search engines. For example, most technologies have news letters, weekly/monthly magazines, mailing lists, community boards or other forms of group communication through which you can gradually discover better content sources (individuals or groups) on what interests you. Without the search engine service and its cost (direct or indirect) between you and the content.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago* (5 children)

    During that time, we would find interesting web pages through people and/or specific interests.

    I beg to differ, during that time I found most of my interesting content through AltaVista and its weird cousin HastaLaVista, and aggregators like Portal of Evil (though, bad example, I seem to recall PoE was pretty much the same time as google).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago

    The map https://www.searchenginemap.com/

    You'll see a bunch of them are metasearch engines, and not crawlers

    Mojeek, Kagi and variations of SearXNG are good bets. Kagi will allow curation. Mojeek lets you make "Focus" filters. Worth trying out.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Kagi has been working out pretty ok for me. Quality of searches is good. No ads, no promoted listings; it is fee based.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    If you're a programmer, might I suggest the brave new world of ChatGPT enhanced search via Phind.com

    Even if you're not, it's fantastic. It basically takes your input and processes it like ChatGPT but then is trained to run web searches to grab further information and uses that to progress its own internal monologue. The result is a natural language response with search engine like results down the side which are cited within the main response.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 7 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Qwant

    Try it. It has pretty good results even outside the US and is much more private.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 6 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    I've been using qwant for a while now and I think it's nice

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago* (9 children)

    Have you tried https://duckduckgo.com/ . I've used them a very long time. I do not use Google search.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    DDG just uses Google's search engine, minus all the trackers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 years ago* (4 children)

    Where did you hear this? This isn't true. If you want google without the tracking, use StartPage (if you're using DDG this can be accessed with the !sp bang preface)

    DDG uses Bing as their fallback engine but also does a lot of propitiatory indexing of its own

    https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    There's no such good search engine. I do all my using bangs (duckduckgo terminolgy) or whatever its called on brave and others but maily brave.The reason I use brave is that because they dont pull results from google and bing.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago*

    Maybe try stract, try out the different optics it has. My favorite is the discussions optic. Lots of lemmy/kbin results with that. Hacker news optic might be closer to what you're looking for.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    One of the problems I have with search engines when looking for tech solutions is that the results are incredibly out of date. I don't bother any more and just go straight to the product's own support forum. Where possible I add the forum's own search entry to Firefox's search box. At least I no longer get answers to a problem no one has had since 2018.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›