"Your selected password is already being used by SwiftyFan05. Please choose another password."
post
Somebody isn't sanitizing their inputs properly. Like putting a bandaid on a heart attack
Lol I recently have found the opposite!

Might be a minimum of 16 chars. Or the parsing is broken and treats the ' as the end of the password
I let my password manager create 32 char passwords, that should be enough for a while. But of course then you have websites that throw you a 'your password is too long' message and have you find out by trial and error that they only accept 12 characters.
Or the off-by-one errors where they insist that 24 chars are the max, but in reality they accept 23. Probably never tested the limit.
Or websites that truncate your password after X characters when registering, but not when logging in, so you end up with an incorrect password and good luck finding out which limit the registration page actually uses.
That's a big rainbow table. Like, with just precomputed values and random ascii character passwords it's on the order of 10^42^ entries. You can shave that down a bit probably with all the tricks rainbow tables use, but I think you're safe.
Fandom is gross anyway. Contributing to independent wikis is a much better use of your time. https://getindie.wiki/
they don't specify a limit so 64 character password it is.
Go all in, 1024 character password.
They'll accept it, but won't tell you they ignored everything after character n, and their login page won't take anything but the "correct" password so you'll be spending some time figuring out the actual character count limit...
Fucking MICROSOFT did that with Hotmail
Even worse the password was accepted in full when registered, but the login field won't accept the full length.
My previous bank forced 8 characters with only numbers and letters.
I don't get it, why did you type all asterisks‽
What's not to get? He made his password 7 asterisks. Funny, because it's the same as mine.
Some months back, there was a thread here on Lemmy where people were discussing western names written using Chinese characters. Phonetically, the names will sound alike. But meaning-wise, the characters will result in a Correct Horse Battery Staple-esque string of words.
Which is why I have since decided to make passwords by typing random names into a Chinese name generator and using the English translated result.
Sounds like a lot of work, but the way I see it, trying to think of new passwords is always work so I might as well have fun with it.
64 characters picked at random in [a-zA-Z0-9_] is perfectly fine if password is your only option. Special character do not increase significantly the difficulty of bruteforcing it, but introduce the risk of having to manually type "}à.å÷Â!!ç-×ô@¸Á¢±ãÕß>>úÓ}¼º¤«<_`àÅû§Æ]*ÂñçÌÿ§à®&ܱ=Ú-´ð¹é$.>=;Ö if something goes catastrophically wrong.
Not being allowed to use special characters can be a sign of the website saving your password in plain text.
It's actually nice they have underscore. 😀
Yes because if you choose 8 characters at random, with 25 small + 25 big letters and 10 numeric, it* only 60^8
= 167,961,600,000,000 combinations.
I think the problem is more if the system allows brute force with thousands of erroneous attempts.
Then statistically any hacker can attempt several accounts, and ultimately get lucky. But by all means, put the responsibility to the user, users are the experts right!?
I never got the frantic excessive entropy mindset, when the problem is much simpler to not allow crackers endless attempts. You can allow 50 attempts, and chances would be very slim to guess even pretty moronic passwords.
What's even worse is when they REQUIRE big and small and numbers to maximize entropy, they actually make statistically FEWER attempts necessary to brute force it.
A standard Microsoft introduced in the 90's, and FUCKING almost everybody is using, despite it's a 100% moronic requirement.
Instead just warn against passwords that can be guessed by logic, or can be found in a dictionary.
Most websites don't allow multiple failed logins and, even if they did, the network latency alone would make brute force attacks useless. The point of having a high entropy password is to protect against hackers brute forcing a leaked database of hashes. Having different passwords for every website also protects against this so, as usual, the answer is "just use a password manager".
The point of having a high entropy password is to protect against hackers brute forcing a leaked database of hashes.
I don't think you need to worry about that in this case, the special character restriction suggests to me that they don't hash it.
Try this one, has lots of special characters: a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a
recently did one that only cared about being very long, so i typed thispasswordisfuckinglong and it took it
"for best results, your password should be the street you grew up on or your favourite book"
I hate these arbitrary limitations of 16 characters, 25 is unbreakable and some sites won't allow longer than 16 20, I've even had one site not allow over 6.
I mean, 63^6 is a lot of possibilities, but just make the password longer to increase its security.
Blocking out special characters is dumb, but as others have pointed out, they're probably not sanitizing inputs.
You might want to try out: https://libraryofbabel.info/random.cgi
Ah, I've done that before, 1/100 odds it's because someone doesn't want to fuck with RegEx.
top 50 comments