this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
394 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19287 readers
1815 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump appointed billionaires and major donors like Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to lead his new “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE), aiming to cut $2 trillion from federal spending and dismantle regulations.

DOGE will operate outside federal oversight, focusing on slashing programs and weakening regulatory agencies, including the IRS and Department of Education.

Critics warn that DOGE and broader deregulatory measures will benefit wealthy corporations, aligning with Trump’s agenda to extend tax cuts for the rich and favor oligarchic interests over public welfare, further cementing U.S. plutocracy.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Wait, I thought they were there to lower egg prices!

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Americans are gonna get poorer, then they'll just blame it on the Dems.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Lol, of course they will. They control the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. They essentially can do whatever they want. Something goes wrong while they’re in charge? It’s the dems!

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That was the plan all along.

All of the Christian Nationalist jazz was just a cover for the dual purpose of winning the support of the religious right and distracting from their real goal, which, from the start, has been to fully institutionalize a government that serves the interests of the wealthiest few at the expense of everyone else.

Yes - to some notable degree, that's the system we already have, but with some important distinctions. Under the current system, there are still policies and agencies and programs to nominally limit the abuses of the wealthy and/or protect the interests of the common people. The wealthy can generally manage to get around them, but that requires exploiting loopholes and jumping through complex legal hoops and greasing palms and, if all else fails, paying fines.

The goal is to eliminate all of that so that the wealthy few are entirely unconstrained - so that they won't even have to pretend to do anything other than expand and protect their own privilege, and there will be no legal recourse at all for all of the people they will exploit along the way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

The department of efficiency is meant to make it more efficient for billionaires to fuck us over.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It bears repeating that the DOGE doesn't exist and is unlikely to ever exist. A new federal agency can only be created by an act of congress and that's just not gonna happen.

Therefore, the only power Musk and Ramaswamy possess is the same power any lobbyist with a lot of money possesses: the right to whisper in the ear of representatives who might be convinced to do their bidding.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A new federal agency can only be created by an act of congress

According to who? And who is going to enforce that?

Elon and Trump are not bound by the law. They'll do whatever the fuck they want and nobody is going to stop them. The GOP is full of spineless bitches we grovel at their feet.

Rule of law is dead. The Justice system is dead.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago

It doesn't need to be an official government agency for it to exist. Trump will just rubber stamp anything they say.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is mostly immaterial given the way Trump seems to want to operate this time around. DOGE does not need to exist; Trump will push for whatever Musk and Ramaswamy say.

This is not the time for suggestions of "well, he can't do this because X, so we don't need to worry about it." We absofuckinglutely need to be worrying about all possibilities, even those which may seem impractical given the law.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

The only savior would be if the courts were still legitimate.... Which means we are screwed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

I agree with the sentiment here, but remember that DOGE doesn't have any actual power. it's just an advisory board

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 day ago

The thing everyone paying attention said would happen is happening.

If the stupids didn't listen then, they sure as hell won't listen now.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago (3 children)

To everyone that thought we had an oligarchy: You haven't seen anything yet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I chuckle to myself when I see some bothsiderist doing the WELLACKTCHOOALLY with the tired "leftist" critique about how it was always thus...as if.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The way it's looking is almost a guarantee that crime will have to increase as well. Which they'll try to crack down on hard, which just means compressing and compressing anger until it finally explodes with people slaughtering the rich and burning down their houses and businesses.

They'll act like the people are the criminals, yet the people were the ones being stolen from the entire time, and had no justice being dealt.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Oh it’s going to be horrible, the wealthy will do as they please and flaunt the law, the poor will be worse off year after year.

I simply can’t imagine.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You ain't seen nothing yet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Look at Russia

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Does Elon have a child riding him at all times for a particular reason, or is it controlling him like Ratatouille?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 day ago

Luigi protection

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think he's exploiting his kid to gain public validation that he's an attentive and proud father because he knows he's not. Like how he's using alts on Twitter to compliment himself on being a great father.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

A father who gets lots of sex

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

He's been cosplaying as an "engineer" for quite some time, so he's got this cosplaying thing down.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He started doing that after the Adjuster got Brian Thompson.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Slightly more brazen than before

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm willing to bet a Venn Diagram between cronyism, corporatocracy, oligarchy, plutocracy, fascism, autocracy, kleptocracy, kakistrocracy is almost a circle so I use most of them interchangeably, as debating the variance is splitting hairs. Any one of them will vacillate between the others over a long enough timeline regardless.

The point is our "democracies" are an illusion to varying degrees of blatancy. No matter where you live, the wealthiest individuals and corporations have more power than the rest of the population, and their success is interchangeable with "national security".

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hasn't every president filled their cabinet with plutocrats? This isn't new. What's new is that they're fascists. Well, at least since Nixon.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Usually there's one degree of separation from a billionaire with the appointments. This time it's just straight up billionaires running the government.