this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
43 points (93.9% liked)

politics

22730 readers
4503 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With some of the law’s provisions set to expire, research offers lessons for lawmakers.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"On the downside, taxing business income tends to weigh on the economy. It does so by reducing the incentive to accumulate capital and start new businesses or expand existing ones. That, in turn, lowers national income."

What the absolute fucking hell what what what!? What kind of insanity is that??

"Taxes are too high so I don't want to try to earn more money. I'll settle with less money." Said literally no capitalist ever.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It’s trickle-down with fancier words.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

With some of the law’s provisions set to expire, research offers lessons for lawmakers.

LOLOLOLOLOL.

They will do what they always do. They will double down on the stupid, vote the way Trump tells them to, then blame Democrats when shit goes south, even though they have no power in any branch of government.

Remember, they have gone on record multiple times saying it is the Democrats' job to save them from themselves.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Of course. Trickle down hasn't "worked" in the fifty years we've been doing it, but it "works" in that it's an upwards redistribution of wealth -- which rich people love. So it'll continue and even get worse despite "not working".

They've long since given up on it making any sense for broader fiscal conservativism, and any pretense of it actually trickling down to the poor. As a country, we're now running mask off evil policy and becoming increasingly brazen and proud of it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Horse and sparrow economics is at least 100 years old or older. And just as long disproven. It didn't work in the 19th century, the 20th century, and will continue not to function the way they repeatedly claim in the 21st century.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

@Joker

Book number 437 in an ongoing series of how right wing economics is total horseshit that never works.