this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
203 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19237 readers
2460 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Would love to see Elon in prison.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Would love to see that Nazi dead.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 85 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

"If there's ever been a time to discuss serious campaign finance reform, it is now. We are sliding into a new era of American oligarchy, and unless we take decisive action, the integrity of our democracy is at risk.

This is like saying, "hey, guys, we really need to talk about taking steps to prevent a fire," as the house is burning down.

I also wonder what their definition of "decisive action" is. I get the impression that it involves a lot of talking, and not much else.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 hours ago

"hey, guys, we really need to talk about taking steps to prevent a fire,"

So, like we've been doing with the climate since the 60's?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 hours ago

It involves getting money from other sources, their billionaires. Not the other team's billionaires

[–] [email protected] 78 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

End Citizens United. It blatantly lets billionaires buy politicians. That's the only way out of this.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That's what voters want to do, but that's not what either party wants, and they're private organizations.

If they double down on neoliberalism again at the 2/2/25 chair election, it's time to leave the DNC behind.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, I feel things have become so desperate that centrists, the left, and progressives are starting to look for an alternative to the DNC. It has already begun with Pelosi leading the charge by keeping AOC out of a key House position where she could have offered a fresh perspective for the left.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

centrists

They're the ones actively ruining the DNC....

But I have no doubts if the actual left splits, they'll follow us instead of going back to the Republican party where they belong.

30 years of trying to steal "fiscally conservative, socially liberal" voters has just depressed Dem turnout and made Republicans batshit insane.

They destroyed our political ecosystem and now want to play the fucking victims.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 hours ago

The USA's centrists are right of many countries' traditional conservatives. (Though most countries' conservatives are busy reinventing themselves as fascists these days.) The Democratic Party covers a wide spread of flavors of liberalism, extending quite far into the right of the political spectrum.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 10 hours ago

Unfortunately the bought politicians are the only ones who can end it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 hours ago

Sic semper tyrannis