Summary

Euthanasia accounted for 4.7% of deaths in Canada in 2023, with 15,300 people opting for assisted dying—a 16% increase, though slower than prior years.

Most recipients had terminal illnesses, primarily cancer, and 96% were white, sparking questions about disparities.

Quebec, at 37% of cases, remains Canada's euthanasia hotspot.

Since legalizing assisted dying in 2016, Canada has expanded access, now covering chronic conditions and planning to include mental illnesses by 2027.

Critics, citing rapid growth and controversial cases, warn of insufficient safeguards, while proponents highlight strict eligibility criteria. Debate continues globally.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 106 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I'm surprised it's that many, but it's people who are allowed to die with dignity, and released from a life of pain.
I hate we don't have that right here in Denmark.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago

    Not that surprising given how big our aging boomer demographic is. This was my father two years ago who had fought a year long battle with cancer before deciding to go with MAID. He was already hospitalized in palliative care and it may have only saved him a day or two more of suffering. In fact after how rough his final night was, I wish he had been able to let go a day earlier.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 42 points 2 years ago

    At least in Canada people can choose euthanasia because they are in pain rather than because they're bankrupting their family

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I would be curious how this affects the suicide statistics.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago* (23 children)

    It’s ridiculous that there is a prerequisite of terminal illness

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (17 children)

    There's a huge push from the right that this is unethical to offer it in the first place and that soon we are just going to let people euthanize themselves instead of "treating" them. I mean, i don't want people to do this either, but who are we to force a choice onto someone?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Yep - "unethical" to let people die without suffering and passing on financial ruin to loved ones, but "ethical" to kill criminals for their misdeeds. That's superb logic from the right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    I don’t disagree with you, but I think you’re thinking US not Canada. Death penalty is not Canadian. I don’t think? And health cares free (not to say there’s not other costs associated).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (12 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    There were issues early on and people who shouldn't have been offered the option, got offered the option.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    Quebec has 9 million divided by Canada's 41 = 22% by population.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Lets keep context here. The largest generation in history is at the end of their lifespan in many cases. The stats are as inflated as that generational bubble.

  • source
  • [+] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›