I doubt it's the real guy. Might be the fall guy.
post
My question is whether a jury would find him not guilty. If it were e.g. a grieving father who didn't have to lose their child if UHC had covered some treatment, I could see a jury throwing the verdict. With this guy?
But don't they weed out biased people from juries? Before accepting someone onto a jury they'd ask "do you have a grudge against health insurance companies," or something.
I hope every juror who has ever had a claim denied by health insurance lies about it in the interview.
I think that the "bias" thing has more to do with relation to the involved parties or the incident itself, not some general predisposition.
I think you're right. The difficulty is finding yanks who don't have a grudge lol.
I can absolutely be wrong here, but I'll stick my neck out and say I don't buy this story so far. The color of language the police are using alone suggests less proof than they claim.
I do, however, generally believe everything the NYPD says, especially under pressure from the zuggurat lords. And it's not like the Mayor of NY is a comically corrupt and compulsively lying pig, or anything...
Edit: phrasing
all 27 comments