top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 106 points 2 years ago

It's still just money laundering

  • source
  • [–] 90 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    For anyone else wondering:

    "The artwork owner is given a certificate of authenticity that the work was created by Cattelan as well as instructions about how to replace the fruit when it goes bad."

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Is it really the same artwork, in that case?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Bingo, that's the point. It's a statement on the value of art. At the end of the day, a painting is just a piece of linen with shit smeared all over it. You might as well just tape a banana to the wall and be done with it. But it also shows something else - art isn't just paint smeared canvas. It has meaning behind it and it evokes emotion.

    So this guy eating it and pissing off 90% of people does the best thing that he could have done. Also, the remaining 10% know that it is not about the banana on the wall which was replacable. It was about the emotions - the outrage, the trolling. It is the same artwork - since art isn't just paint / just a banana.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    This is something I've never really stopped to think about until now, but this artwork is actually a piece of genius.

    It's an idea, or a concept, expressed in the form of a banana taped to a wall. It cannot be destroyed, or duplicated. You can tape a banana to a wall, but there can be only one banana taped to a wall. You can destroy the banana, the tape, or even the wall, and the artwork remains, because you cannot destroy an idea. In fact, someone already has eaten the banana.

    Furthermore, everyone talking about it merely increases the value of the piece.

    It's absolutely genius.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Ductaping a banana on a wall needs instructions?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 81 points 2 years ago

    It's one banana, what could it cost, 6.2 million?

  • source
  • [–] 66 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Anyone who says the rich deserve to BE rich because they are "clever businessmen" need to repeatedly kicked in the balls.

    Most folks could live comfortably for the rest of their lives on what this idiot spent on a banana.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Which is why it's really weird for people to be so greedy after they've already accomplished five million.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 2 years ago

    This is a special keystone headline used to warn time travellers to keep on driving to the next timeline, this one is cooked, attempt no landing here

  • source
  • [–] 58 points 2 years ago (18 children)

    I'll never understand spending that money like that instead of helping kids with cancer.

    Probably one of the several reasons why I am not rich.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • load more comments (17 replies)
    [–] 32 points 2 years ago

    Fuck this insufferable world.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago*

    surely the banana is rotten by now wasn't this years ago yup he just replaced the banana so he just ate... a banana, which he could've done with every previous banana that went rotten too if he doesn't mind soft bananas

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    Wow food prices have really risen.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I respect every part except "crypto entrepreneur".

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Idk it seems par for the course

    The 34-year-old crypto businessman was last year charged by the US Securities and Exchange Commission with fraud and securities law violation in relation to his crypto project Tron.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    There's never been a better time to reference Arrested Development;

    "There's ALWAYS, money, in the Banana Stand"

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    wow that is a very long article to say bullshit

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago
    [+] 1 point 2 years ago
    [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    NFT artists kind of hide behind the oldschool art world to justify it...

    I think it shows how stupid that world is.

    The point of art is to move people, to make them think and feel something by conveying the artist's thoughts, not be a store of value. And while I've been to museums with gorgeous pieces, if you're paying millions for a painting, at some point most of that value is the gratification of hoarding it. That same money could buy you an incredible experience in today's art landscape, but it's not about the experience, is it? And NFTs are like the perfect deconstruction of that.

    That being said, OP I am downvoting your post because eyeballs are exactly what crypto bros want, no offense :P

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›