top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 159 points 2 years ago (7 children)

If only there was an alternative.
What if we replace vulcanized rubber with a metal ring 🤔

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 141 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Maybe it could also run on some kind of metal street, to further reduce friction? 🤔

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 100 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    we could probably manage traffic much easier if switching was controlled vs. random drivers...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    While we're at it, maybe we could install some powerlines to provide the vehicles with electricity. That way they could run on renewable energy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    Sounds like it'll be rough on the road, but I'm willing to try it! /s

    I miss the trains of NJ and NYC so badly, this part of Texas fucking sucks with public transportation. Losing access to a car here has you flirting dangerously close to homelessness. Which is also why I'll usually give a ride to anyone who asks around here.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 127 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Geez, here is another issue for which we've known about for 40 or so years that requires "urgent Action" for the past 40 years already

    Wake me up when we finally do something

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    Boomers have categorically chosen apathy in favor of their own self interests since 1970. By the late 90s, they were a wrecking ball.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I disagree. People who live their entire lives being relentless bombarded by consumerist propaganda and pro-capitalist disinformation are not truly free to vote against it, nor were they given the chance. Al Gore cared more about the environment than Bush, but he was still a capitalist that supported car dependency and the military industrial complex.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago*

    So you're absolving "Generation Me" of ever having to think for themselves? The same generation that could have educated themselves for less than the price of new car, and simply chose not to because a high school diploma was enough?

    Millennials were just as heavily, if not more propagandized, and yet, as a cohort, we have skewed far from Baby Boomers (ie Millenials are killing x), while retaining the ability to be critical of the systems we have inherited. We are also far more educated and far more in debt. All as a result of Boomers subsidizing their own welfare on the backs of their children and grandchildren.

    Baby Boomers collectively failed upward, soaked up benefit after benefit while telling themselves that they deserved their station in life, and then pulled up every ladder behind them.

    So, hard disagree.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 76 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    If only there was a highly efficient mode of transporting people that didn’t use tires. Ah well, nothing can be done I guess.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago

    Yes, imagine if there was a fast and safe way of transport. Something like made to run on steel bars in order to reduce friction. I don't know. I'm just imagining, I watch too much science fiction.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    My city's metro system uses rubber tyres, :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 58 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    While there's no doubt tires are bad for the environment, a quarter of all microplastics seems a lot, especially since plastic is everywhere. Gladly there's a source for that claim, a link to tireindustryproject's FAQ... Claiming that this number is a gross overestimation. What the fuck is this article? Is it supposed to be satire or something?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I've seen a similar number in a lot of proper scientific sources, so this article may be bunk, but the number is correct I think.

    For example this article: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171003 They claim 27,26% in China.

    And this article: https://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/2024-0106.pdf They claim 24.88% in the EU and state it's among the biggest if not the biggest contributor to microplastics.

    I'm all for debunking stuff, but about a quarter seems to be the currently accepted quantity to the best of our abilities to measure.

    There is a bit of confusion between the amount tyres contribute into the ocean, how much into the ocean and waterways and how much in the environment as a whole. A lot of it ends up in the soil, so it doesn't contribute to plastics in the water, but still in the environment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Bear in mind that the denominator is plastic pollution. Most plastic waste does not directly pollute the environment. If it is not recycled then it goes to landfills or incineration. Not ideal, but at least the damage is contained. (The bulk of ocean plastic comes from the rivers of poor countries without proper waste management.)

    The issue with tyre microplastics is that it's all but impossible to channel the waste. It's the same with synthetic fabric: just washing it creates pollution that's really hard to control.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 57 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    The other big offender are synthetic textiles btw.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] [S] 49 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    This is also yet another reason SUVs are bad: bigger tyres, higher weight, more wear, more pollution.

    It's also another reason to have lower speed limits: less friction, less wear, less pollution.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 41 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    What if we wrapped the tyres in bags to contain all the dust?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 40 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Action won't happen. In fact, we'll increase the amount of pollution!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 39 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    That’s on top of all the brake dust cars spread.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago (9 children)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 29 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    so, basically, drive on three wheels and the problem's solved?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    But electric cars will fix everything. Thats what electric car manufacturers said!

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›