Je sais tout ça. Je dis simplement qu'il n'y a pas de noir et de blanc ici, de commun accord le WaPo sort encore du journalisme irréprochable (hors page d'opinion donc), il y a encore d'excellents journalistes qui y travaillent, et il n'est pas encore temps de tout jeter.
That's interesting. I paid a bit over a grand (a lot of money, sure) for what amounts to a full-on scooter with pedals. Seemed amazingly good value to me! For information, I'm not in the USA and the e-bike comes from a certain large hegemonic Asian country.
Article très bref ! Ça valait le coup de poster ? Alors c'est vrai que j'ai déjà été planté par cette ligne, qui a subi un glissement de terrain juste avant mon départ. J'ai dû prendre le bus.
Oui oui d'accord, on ne peut plus se fier à quoi que ce soit, ils sont tous vendus, tout est foutu, etc etc, c'est compris
I'll be honest, a quick review of this thread did not clearly reveal who was downvoting who for what. My position, and this other person's, is that downvoting opinions is bad manners and toxic to healthy discussion. If there was genuinely harmful advice there, then OK, downvote away.
(Obviously these days the word "harmful" is thrown around liberally so this probably just puts us back to square one.)
Exactly my point. The virtual equivalent of taping someone's mouth shut because you happen not to agree with what they say.
Their original staff was a bunch of pretty serious journalists sourced from the BBC.
Si on juge comme ça, il n'y a pas un seul journal français crédible. Ils appartiennent tous aux milliardaires. Sauf que, de fait, on y trouve toujours du bon journalisme car la structure de propriété n'est pas le seul critère pour juger la crédibilité.
En l'occurrence le WaPo reste très sérieux comme source.
Similar to: chough
It's a type of bird but good luck knowing how to pronounce it. Ahh, English.
A few years ago I considered learning Greek. Abandoned the plan because Greek has the triple whammy:
So: good luck.
I generally agree but I still feel it's important to keep some perspective. Bluesky is not the solution but it's definitely progress compared to existing corporate platforms (because it has real fundamental differences - several articles posted here went into detail about this).
IMO the best argument against Bluesky is that it will suck up the oxygen for other, better, solutions. That's a fair theory but it seems to me that there's plenty of market share to go round right now. Everyone is still on the evil corporate platforms.
Agree, I use it every day.