554

This software does not exist (lemmy.zip)

submitted 1 year ago by Maven@lemmy.zip to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://github.com/brianmcfadden/whoisAddressBarInterpreter/blob/97fa311681218e064c7a77fe4feafd22ccab4589/LICENSE

top 28 comments

sorted by: hot top new old

[-] vvv@programming.dev 121 points 1 year ago

[-] otacon239@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago

Sadly, this has the same issue as the DO WHATEVER THE FUCK YOU WANT license because it doesn’t protect the creator from liability. Otherwise, I always love these parody licenses.

[-] db2@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

WTFPL rules. 🤷

[-] db2@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

$ sudo ./gaslight.sh

[-] Pantless_Paladin@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

sudo does not exist. Are you sure you're not misspelling sumo?

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

sado

BTW how do you do the red text?

[-] fishbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

If I recall correctly, the colored text is client specific and it colors common/specific words when when their in code format.

Are you by chance using voyager?

[-] ulterno@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, e.g. I got the 're in blue and everything else light grey.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Connect :-)

[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Nah I think its some weird misspelling of doas :3

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Sir, this is a wendys.

[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago

db2 is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 45 points 1 year ago

The screenshot seems to violate the licence it contains.

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

There is no screenshot. You are imagining it. Fuck you and your screenshot!

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago

Oh, that explains it. Well, I imagine a license that also forbids people to imagine it. Fuck you and your imagination

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I imagine.

...

Fuck.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Is there a name for this license framework?

FU License?

[-] Maven@lemmy.zip 44 points 1 year ago

It's titled FUCK YOUR LICENSE at the top so I'm guessing that it's called FUCK YOUR

[-] warm@kbin.earth 25 points 1 year ago

Fuck my what?

[-] db2@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Yes.

[-] And009@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago

Thanks

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah that's either not an acronym or it's a shite acronym.

[-] RustyNova@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm going to burst your bubble but GitHub doesn't allow non open source licenses on public repositories.

Just ask winamp lol

Edit: not open source, but at least forkable and viewable

[-] frezik@midwest.social 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Winamp had a bunch of other issues with code they didn't own being stuck in that repo. Github encourages FOSS licenses, but doesn't require it.

https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/licensing-a-repository

You're under no obligation to choose a license. However, without a license, the default copyright laws apply, meaning that you retain all rights to your source code and no one may reproduce, distribute, or create derivative works from your work.

...

If you publish your source code in a public repository on GitHub, according to the Terms of Service, other users of GitHub.com have the right to view and fork your repository. If you have already created a repository and no longer want users to have access to the repository, you can make the repository private. When you change the visibility of a repository to private, existing forks or local copies created by other users will still exist. For more information, see "Setting repository visibility."