this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
898 points (97.8% liked)

Progressive Politics

1064 readers
779 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yet another reminder that most Americans don't understand how the government works. What is one Dem senator going to do in a government that is 100% controlled by Republicans?

Voters need to do something and actually give the Dems a majority before complaining that they don't get anything done.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

The Dems still control the Executive, including the Attorney General, and the Senate.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

They didn't before and won't do it now.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Twitter is dumb as fucking fuck. Political leaders shouldn't be there. If you shitpost, you shouldn't be in charge of anything but shitposting.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago

No I'm sure the current plan of wag your finger and then refuse to actually enforce the law out of a desire to "not sink to his low" will continue to work just fine /s

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Trump will go down in history as the world's most successful career criminal.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Is it really a law if it's unenforceable?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

*selectively enforced against poor people

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago
  • The understood value of "poor" will also increase.
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Is it really justice when laws cannot be applied to presidents as the founding fathers argued that doing so would interfere with president's purported ability to govern - even if they commit crimes?

The USA is comically naive in assuming presidents would act honorably and would respect the law voluntarily.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Crumbling empire

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago (12 children)

This was the last time i vote for a dem candidate. they pay mouth service to progressive policies, but at the end of the day, they do next to nothing for us.

back in in the 2010s when obama was president, there was a time when the dems controlled the house AND the senate at the same time. we still didn't get any real progressive shit passed. the only thing i can think of is daca and obamacare. we didn't get single payer, universal nationalized healthcare, we didn't get robust protections for the working class, we didn't responsibly pull out of iraq or afghanistan, the environment is fucked and there's nothing that we can do about it anymore, big banks got bailed out at the expense of the working class, university cost was and has continued to be at an all time high. They didn't fix the gerrymandering the gop has been getting away with. They didn't set term limits on justices. they didn't fight back when the Rs blocked merick garland. They did nothing to fix the broken electoral system. They did nothing to fix the economic policies set in the reagan era. they did nothing to set a law banning PACs, lobbyists or special interests. the only thing the dem party has going for it is that they are not literally the party of fascists.

2 weeks before the election wasn't the time to start getting excited about a third party. The time for third partying is now, and keep it up until the next one. I'm not going to forgive the dem party for their inaction and they should absolutely be punished by no longer existing as the opposition party.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

This was the last time i vote for a dem candidate. they pay mouth service to progressive policies, but at the end of the day, they do next to nothing for us.

I'm genuinely hoping (but not holding my breath) that this is a come to Jesus moment for the Democratic party and that they start actually representing the left side. They need to get it through their heads that trying to play the "lesser evil" isn't going to work anymore. If they didn't learn from this election, they will never learn. I'm expecting the latter, btw.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Didn't even close fucking Guantanamo. Remember Guantanamo? It's still a thing.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

as someone who has never used twitter, it always confuses me that twitter sometimes puts the reply before the message that’s being replied to. why do it this way?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It isn't so much as a reply on a re-tweet, if you comment or "reply" to any tweet then the layout is the same as any other social media site and nests it under the post. Whereas for re-tweeting it is more like sharing something, like a link or an article, and your desired message into a post, just like here in lemmy your title or message is at the top and your content is under it. In this context the tweet is your content.

I hope that made sense

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 149 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (15 children)

I’m going to be ignoring the news for the next couple years. “Trump Did Something Horrific,” followed by nothing of any consequence but “raising awareness.”

Wake me up when there’s a real resistance.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago

I'm not American and will do the same. The amount of artificial and inflated drama is just unbearable. Not for another four years.

"Trump said this unacceptable thing!!!1!" followed by a few days of outrage, nothing changes, then he says another stupider shit a few days layer and the cycle continues.

In a way I'm sure the media are very happy for that Trump win. They're gonna have some drama every fucking day.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 115 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If there is no enforcement then there is no law.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

There is enforcement, if you don't have enough income or if you have the wrong skin tone-

[–] [email protected] 71 points 2 days ago (27 children)

How about we do something about it instead of expecting someone else to?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's the perennial coordination problem. Consider these truths: 1. Anybody who stands up alone will get viciously hammered down. 2. If a large number of people stand up together, they can make a difference. 3. People have to trust others to stand up with them, otherwise see #1.

How do we organize a large crowd of people that trust each other without the people in power catching wind of it and viciously hammering down the organizers? It sure would help to have some support from people already in positions of power...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

This is part of why, as much grief as it gets, the 4B movement is something that can plausibly gain traction. Because it doesn't really require anyone "outing" themselves and thus putting themselves at risk, it can be done without coordination, leadership, and trust. Boycotts function on a similar premise.

They are a useful tool in some ways, but the issue is the relatively limited scope of what these sorts of efforts can accomplish.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›