top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 75 points 2 years ago (23 children)

They aren't protecting you. They are protecting themselves from what you may give their enemies. Don't think just because the federal government is doing something "for the people" that nominally it's not about the government itself. National security is literally the government protecting itself by protecting its citizens.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Pretty much this! Also it is much easier and cheaper to tell Google to stop offering tiktok in their app store then it is to build affordable housing where it is needed..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Yea but where? There’s a push for it in my state. Drove past a new area that will be a neighborhood of cookie cutter SFH, probably with driveways too short to contain full size vehicles. And they’ll cost more than half a million so I’m not sure how that’s affordable. Anyway. It’s being built on the flood plain. 8/10 flood factor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    We really need more high density housing closer to urban centers, but Americans seem to be allergic to it. Everyone wants their single family house. Also too, without subsidies they're is no profit incentive for developers to build the necessary housing stock, they all shoot for "luxury" housing because it's the most profitable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    If only we made a school for teaching people how to do the things we need most. It could be run by the government as a nonprofit. We could incorporate medical and all the other industries we are getting gouged by.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    Facebook sold personal data to a foreign organization called Cambridge Analytica who used it to influence our elections. If their motivations are to protect us via protecting themselves, why is Facebook not banned, and not even in the discussion of being banned?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 32 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    I’m on board with the sentiment but are we really defending TikTok? I haven’t kept up on the issue but personally I wouldn’t cry if TikTok went away.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

    Facefuck and Twatter are just as bad but they spy on Americans for America, so it is allowed

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    *40 year inflation brought on because the government wanted 14 years of free money for Corporations.

    Monetary policy and Corporate price gouging are the drivers for inflation. Everything else is noise.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Ok but fuck tik Tok. Ban that shit. This comment is basically saying that banning tik Tok takes the same effort as giving your people healthcare.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago*

    Ok because I see a lot of stupid shit in here, you don't get to talk about banning tiktok if you don't talk about banning Instagram, Reddit, X and YouTube, who use the same formula, with equal fervour.

    Now please talk about healthcare, climate crisis, the Palestinian ethnic cleansing by that cancerous, land grabbing, terrorist Israeli state and the shrinking buying power of the people all around the world.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (16 children)

    Then you should have voted blue, idiot. This situation exists because of apathy and antigovernment sentiment.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Did Clinton ever undo all the load of crap Reagan and Bush gave us?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Clinton was 30 fucking years ago and Republicans have been stonewalling ever since then on every since one of these issues.

    What the fuck are you talking about about????

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago*

    Clinton signed into law a whole raft of neoliberal policies that were started by Bush, and the cumulative effects of those policies over those decades are what we're feeling right now and what we warned about back then. The frogs have been boiled while the populace bickers about which neoliberal corporate shill sits on the puppet throne. They're after all our money and they're getting it by distracting us with the political circus and dividing us with wedge issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Got news for you, their not protecting us from Tik Tok either.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Calling Republicans government...smh

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    How can Steve ban tiktok if Doug won't let him mitigate homelessness? Why is Bob talking about housing when Alex is gung-ho on genocide?

    Sorry, I meant to ask: how can the government ban tiktok when the government won't do anything about homelessness? How can the government be proud of mitigating homelessness when the government supports genocide?

    Citizens United must be a curse from a Greek god. A funny little jab to highlight our tendency to oversimplify.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Im down with the idea of social media being a threat to citizens for so long as the algorithms optimize for anger.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Mostly agreed, but is anyone really getting minimum wage? Walmart pays double that to start in my little town.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›