I object to having Nottingham in my group those guys would be more of a hindrance than anything else.
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
43 points (100.0% liked)
okmatewanker
583 readers
95 users here now
No foul language - i.e. French ๐คฎ
Obviously satire, dozy wankers
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Meatshields for Smoggie berserkers to get in close.
A united England could only take a divided Scotland by marrying into it.
The outcome is clear, Scotland sweeps then starts fighting itself.
Boy those Scots sure a contentious bunch.
those Scots sure a contentious bunch.
You just made an enemy for life!
Northern Ireland doesn't get its own zone because the outcome would be too obvious otherwise.
They'd kill each other at the first chance.
If there's booze involved, then definitely 13.
If there's no booze allowed... 13.
Idk, I feel like if it's total population of zones almost everywhere is at a disadvantage to London. If it's champions style and there's a set number of people in the brawl, definitely 13.
10 has Liverpool, Manchester and Leeds. I reckon the only real challenge would be 13 but combining forces they could take Glasgow and then pick of any lone Highland madman.
10 has a huge numerical advantage over Glasgow, and we could counter their casuals with Mancunian spiceheads. The scousers could be a liability or an asset, but then someone has to stand at the front and get mown down by the initial Highland berzerker charge.
If the women from 13 get involved, 13.
They will be using readily available objects as weapons however.
Then they'd be disqualified, as it's "no weapons".
Didn't the English already try this and yall eventually wound up with the UK?
That was largely done with good old bribing people to be on your side, its also how we got the British empire as it basically started with paying various groups in India to fight eachother which is what allowed the British to conquer a nation that was far wealthier and more powerful at the time.