this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
535 points (85.5% liked)

politics

19050 readers
3873 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I'm ashamed I fell for her scam in 2016, was in CA though so wasn't worried my vote would directly help the orange waste of baryonic matter.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Note: Jill is literally paid to run as a spoiler, and if you look at her actual policies, lot of transphobia, ablism, and support for pseudoscience

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago

This shouldn’t surprise anyone considering her source.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 days ago

Jill Stein has my vote! Seriously, she took it. Can someone help me get it back?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 days ago (1 children)

guys it's not that hard, all we have to do is to not vote for still jein.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

... there were people voting for stein?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

i would hope not, but idk why else you would be running lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (23 children)

I don't understand why it is taken for granted that if Stein wasn't a candidate the people who vote for her would be voting for the Democrats instead. Just as likely they would not vote at all or vote for some other protest candidate.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

jesus christ this thread is a fucking nightmare bro

i feel like i've done three pounds of ketamine just scrolling through these comments.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

This gives big "RFK Jr. will steal votes from Kamala"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

Kamala Harris can win over all of those Jill Stein voters with a single sentence.

Stupid Jill Stein's entire campaign is based on the premise that Democrats would keep a genocide going for an entire year into election season.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Israel is the party at war with Hamas, not the Democrats.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (16 children)

Let’s completely forget everything but the election for this hypothetical. Do you think Harris coming out and saying “I will immediately stop supporting Israel” she will automatically win? Or do you think it’s more likely the Jewish community would condemn her words and move over to the rubber stamp in chief who would give Israel even more support with fewer conditions? (Ignoring the personal favors he asks for of course.)

Yall act like this is a simple black and white issue, when it’s obviously not. Even when you boil it down to “just” the election.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Republicans hate this one simple trick!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›