this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
562 points (96.7% liked)

linuxmemes

20785 readers
1260 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
562
submitted 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

Fuck me, I'm crylaughing at this

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Bullshit, there's always reasons listed. Some more, some less opiniated, but there's always lists.

For me personally:

  • no portability
  • not-invented-here syndrome
    • manages stuff it shouldn't, like DNS
    • makes some configurations unneccessarily complicated
  • more CVE than all other init together
    • service manager that runs with PID 0
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

To the feature creep: that's kind of the point. Why have a million little configs, when I could have one big one? Don't answer that, it's rhetorical. I get that there are use cases, but the average user doesn't like having to tweak every component of the OS separately before getting to doom-scrolling.

And that feature creep and large-scale adoption inevitably has led to a wider attack surface with more targets, so ofc there will be more CVEs, which—by the way—is a terrible metric of relative security.

You know what has 0 CVEs? DVWA.

You know what has more CVEs and a higher level of privilege than systemd? The linux kernel.

And don'tme get started on how bughunters can abuse CVEs for a quick buck. Seriously: these people's job is seeing how they can abuse systems to get unintended outcomes that benefit them, why would we expect CVEs to be special?

TL;DR: That point is akin to Trump's argument that COVID testing was bad because it led to more active cases (implied: being discovered).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Try writing a init script on systemD.

It's amazingly simple

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I feel like anyone who genuinely has a strong opinion on this and isn't actively developing something related has too much time on their hands ricing their desktop and needs to get a job

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

My full-time job literally involves dealing with systemd's crap. There is a raspberry pi that controls all of our signage. Every time it is powered on, systemd gets stuck because it's trying to mount two separate partitions to the same mount point, whereupon I have to take a keyboard and a ladder, climb up the ceiling, plug in the keyboard, and press Enter to get it to boot. I've tried fixing it, but all I did was break it more.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

systemd gets stuck because it's trying to mount two separate partitions to the same mount point

Uh... Sounds like it's not really systemd's fault, your setup is just terrible.

I've tried fixing it, but all I did was break it more.

If you're unable to fix it, maybe get somebody else? Like, this doesn't sound like it's an unfixable issue...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 hours ago

Uh… Sounds like it’s not really system’s fault, your setup is just terrible.

I don't know his specific issue, but the general behavior of systemd going completely nuts when something is a bit 'off' in some fashion that is supremely confusing. Sure, there's a 'mistake', but good luck figuring out what that mistake is. It's just systemd code tends to be awfully picky in obscure ways.

Then when someone comes along with a change to tolerate or at least provide a more informative error when some "mistake" has been made is frequently met with "no, there's no sane world where a user should be in that position, so we aren't going to help them out of that" or "that application does not comply with standard X", where X is some standard the application developer would have no reason to know exists, and is just something the systemd guys latched onto.

See the magical privilege escalation where a user beginning with a number got auto-privileges, and Pottering fought fixing it because "usernames should never begin with a number anyway".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

can you get something besides a pi?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

As someone who's not a developer at all and has been making a comic about systemd for a rather small audience, it's worse than you think: We actually have stuff to do and procrastinate on them while spending time and thoughts in this, reading old blog posts and forum debates as if deciphering Sumerian epic poems. Many pages were made while I was supposed to be preparing for exams, which I barely passed. Others when I should've been cleaning up for moving. I think part of the reason why I haven't made any in a while is that with a faithful audience being born and waiting for the next chapter, it's started feeling like something I had to do, and therefore, the type of stuff I procrastinate on.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Congratulations on passing your exams! Hang in there. 🙂

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Thank you! This year's even harder, but I'm hanging on!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

What's system md? Sounds like the name of 90s anti-virus software.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Norton McCaffersky System MD Super Scanner Virus Protection.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)
[     *] (3 of 3) A stop job is running for User Manager for UID 1000... (1m12s / 3m)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)
# nano /etc/systemd/{system,user}.conf
----
DefaultTimeoutStopSec=10s

You're welcome.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

What is the default of the default?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

OH LOOK A CONF FILE TO EDIT.

Full circle, bitches.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 hours ago

Type reboot into an SSH session and play everyone's favorite game show...

WILL IT ACTUALLY DO IIIIIIIIIIIIIIT

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 hours ago

Do people still debate about systemd?

load more comments
view more: next ›