this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
-134 points (5.3% liked)

politics

19090 readers
3993 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit 1: Does no one read in Lemmy? Lol.

I got downvoted for posting a fact check about this myth from a reputable source.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Edit 1: Does no one read in Lemmy? Lol.

I got downvoted for posting a fact check about this myth from a reputable source.

Because no one thinks she did...

If you posted:

Is Harris an energy vampire trying to take over the world for the Golden Retriever lobby?

People wouldn't care if the link says she's not, everyone knows shes not and they're just downvoting a clickbait headline.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I firmly support the golden retrievers, as long as they keep out the doodles.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What about Golden-doodles? (Or like my dog, a mutt-doodle)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Mutts rule! I'm not all in on the 'get a breeder dog and mix it with a breeder doodle to make a breeder something doodle'.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Also might be related to the fact that this was actually fact checked some time ago, e.g. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kamala-harris-earpiece-earrings/

So it's not "new" news (though the bit about it floating on Chinese language networks might be a new morsel, but you'd have to read the article to see that)

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Edit 1: Does no one read in Lemmy? Lol.

No, we do not.
Things that might help, outright say in your text field "No." Personally, I don't like the article title that gives the conspiracy theory any more visibility.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Right. Save me the click.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm just guessing, but I bet the downvotes have more to do with the clickbait headline. It should read: Harris Did Not Wear Earbuds or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Better headline would be "Debunking false Harris cheating conspiracies", but if they did that no one would bother reading it. The conspiracy believers will ignore everything that goes against their conspiracy (including ironically this article even if they read it), and everyone else will ignore it because of course she didn't "cheat". It's pure clickbait.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

No.

No she did not.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hi. Let me explain my downvote to you, 101.

When you post an article, you get a screen that looks like this:

In that form, you can submit the title as is, or add more context, in the Title field. For instance, you could have given the full title, including the subtitle:

This would have made your post clearer.

Alternatively, in the Body field, you could have included a few lines from the article.

The claim was shared on Russian state-run media Sputnik’s Chinese-language Weibo on Sept. 11, 2024.

“Harris wore the Nova H1 Audio earrings during last night’s debate with Trump,” the claim reads in part. Sputnik cited “American musician Jonnie King” to back its claim.

-and-

A photo comparison between the earrings worn by Harris during the debate and the Nova H1 shows they differ in shape. In particular, the metal portions of both earrings show a major difference.

-and-

Under the debate rules issued by ABC it is forbidden to use props or pre-written notes.

However, ABC did provide pen and paper for each candidate’s use during the debate.

...would have made great fodder for the body of your post.

Either way, and I suspect you would have gotten better reader engagement. Let's not reward bad journalism and ~~bullshit~~conspiracy theory factories, please.

Edit: A word.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's a stupid headline and has already been debunked. The ONLY reason to post this - especially as a question - is to keep the question 'alive' for a little while longer. That is why you're getting down-voted.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The real scoop is that Trump himself wore a bluetooth communication device throughout the debate - the tell tale signs of subtle vibrations have been confirmed by independent experts - I've seen talk of this before on Lemmy but it seems like MSM have been suppressing this story... yet another case of conservative bias.

It's been credibly pointed out elsewhere that Trump pulled a Hans Neimann

It's well known that Donald Trump was using a bluetooth butt plug during the debate [...]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

So projection…

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

Radio Free Asia - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Radio Free Asia:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.rfa.org/english/news/afcl/afcl-harris-earrings-09182024053204.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support