this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
509 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

58072 readers
3419 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 199 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 120 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Money has been spent, budgets committed, etc. Think of it like steering a large ship. You may turn the wheel immediately, but the ship will take time to adjust it's course.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 week ago

Yeah but it has also been 2 full years since he bought it

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ahh...the fortune 500 excuse...luckily those ships contain cash hordes that won't run out for decades to centuries.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

It takes time for approvals and the general clusterfuck of decision-making. I'm not defending it, just what I see.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

The Titanic Effect.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes but also not really, they could just stop buying those ads

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

And if they already paid for a certain amount of ads? What if there is a contract and they are obligated to have their ads on the platform for a certain amount of time? There are any number of reasons why they can't just pull the plug , no matter how much they may or may not want to.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

Often there are contracts. Sometimes for a very long time, often multi-year. There are sometimes escape clauses (like a morality clause for a spokesperson), but these aren't easy to invoke.

I suspect many of them are up for annual review/renewal, when they can be terminated without penalty. It might also just be an attempt to get better terms.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yup. Every company still on there is a Nazi brand. If they actually cared about that they’d pull their ads immediately.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Is there a list of companies still showing ads there? I will gladly avoid them all.

[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Musk plans to sue advertisers planning to withdraw from x in record numbers.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

That’ll surely fix it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

He cant sue them for leaving. He can (and did) sue them for collusion, at which point they promptly closed up shop because they knew what they were doing was illegal.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 week ago

pertinent numbers

a net 26% of marketers plan to decrease their spending on X in 2025

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 week ago

Well he did tell them to go fuck themselves, so it’d make sense for them to decide to just fuck right off.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

About fucking time. I'm just sick of the "news" about X. Hopefully it disappears for good.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

Apparenrtly the "plan" would only drop Twitter down to $2B a year.

That plus Musk putting in whatever's needed - it's not going anywhere anytime soon.

Now, if people mass left the platform, that would change things. But it's still suuuuper popular, because people fucking suck.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Only 4% of marketers overall think X ads provide “brand safety” — certainty that their ads won’t appear alongside extreme content —

The 4% may represent lumpy pillow manufacturers, sellers of freeze dried survival food, random cryptocurrency products, and Trump 2024 flag/tshirt providers.

The spokesperson added that X’s “brand safety rate is on average 99%, as validated by DoubleVerify and Integral Ad Science,” companies that analyze the value of digital advertising placements.

"But that 1% remaining will have your products featured next to ads denying the holocaust, hate speech against LGBTQ+ communities, and ads discrediting proven science in favor of, oh I don't know, phrenology or something" -the spokesperson probably

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

And "WE BUY GOLD!!!!*"

*for a fraction of its actual value

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

If Nike is one of these planning to withdrawal advertising with them I'll be very disappointed. They need to just do it.

Sounds like they are trying to double dip by still using it as an ad platform but saying they are working on backing out but also appealing to people that hate bigoted idiots as well.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Knowing nothing about marketing, I figured that after threatening to sue his advertisers there would have been a full-stop on incoming customers and, at the least, a spending level freeze by existing customers.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

I generally avoid voluntarily giving money to people threatening to sue me.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Wow, so brave. Why are they still there?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you are wondering, some of the companies still advertising on Twitter are Samsung, State Farm, The Athletic, and DirecTV.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I’m going to contact my State Farm agent about this. Maybe Geico or Progressive are more adverse to Nazis.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Elon has fucked around so much at this point, he should eventually be enduring a never-ending streak of find outs.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Again? I thought they already left and then there was a lawsuit cause of it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I’d love to know the returns any of these companies are getting on advertising there… it was already pretty bleak before the takeover.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

They gutted Youtube for far, far less.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago