If this was balancing for PVP, I'd get it. But this is balancing against the NPC enemies? Weak. The weakest.
Heavens forbid that someone in Star Wars do hit & run attacks on the empire...
this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
20 points (88.5% liked)
Xbox
5207 readers
5 users here now
An Xbox community for Lemmy!
UNIVERSAL XBOX SUBSCRIBE LINK - CLICK HERE
Click this to open this community in your Specific Instance, then click Subscribe
Rules:
- Stay on topic.
- No hate speech.
- No Politics.
- No console wars. We are all gamers.
- No Clickbait
- Be a decent human.
- No piracy talk or links to copywrited content.
QUICK START GUIDE AND RULES:
New to Lemmy?
View the Getting Started Guide
Attributions:
Xbox Logo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:XBOX_logo_2012.svg
Banner : https://www.xbox.com/en-us/wallpapers/
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Helldivers fanbase has been making this argument but I don’t get it.
Yes, balancing still exists for PVE games, just with different goals. You want to encourage variety, intentionality, and engagement with multiple interesting systems. Games become dull if there’s a working first-order strategy.
I’d argue that could be true of firing a weapon from a vehicle too - it quite often trivializes certain encounters in GTA. Due to AI quirks, there have been times I’ve seen speedrunners get in a parked car to fight off enemies.
Honestly I don't think this one is even worth pirating. The last good Ubisoft game I played was AC Black Flag. Seems like its going to stay that way.
The latest prince of Persia was actually really, really good