this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
-35 points (18.2% liked)

Videos

14313 readers
110 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to [email protected] instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both [email protected] and [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

Our current attempt at democracy—the methods we’re using to elect our leaders—are fundamentally irrational.

They are rational, and they work as intended, it’s just that they’re not popular democracies, they’re bourgeois democracies, designed by & for the capitalist class, and against the working class. They’re not meant to represent us.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Title's hard click bait. It leads up to talking about Arrow's Impossibility theorem, which sets forth some explicit rules for defining a fair election, and communicates that all finite-vote systems are dictatorships that fail to meet those criteria, including ranked choice voting. Arrow's theorem also uses 'dictatorship' in a pretty weird technical fashion, meaning that one individual can technically sway any election with their sole choices.

Directly after, though, Veritasium does acknowledge that Duncan Black pokes holes in the actual value of Arrow's theorem, by showing that many ordinal voting systems will still favor majority preference, and that Arrow's theorem does not apply to rated voting systems like approval voting and STAR voting.

It's pretty bizarre that he decided to make such a click-baity title and front-load only skim over the better solution at the end, right near election month.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Derek made a video years several back where he admits that they ran tests on their videos and that using click bait titles made their videos preform far better. So here we are.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Thats what happens when you have algorithms promote content based on click-through rate and engagement metrics. Creators have to use click-bait and sensationalism to get their content to spread. Its common knowledge at this point. I can't think of any sizable creators that don't use this, and generally the more they abuse it, the larger the channel.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

This is a Veritasium video. Despite the clicky-baity title it's not an indictment of democracy. He's just talking about the mathematical problems inherent in different voting systems. YT Link here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qf7ws2DF-zk

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Could you remove the advertising from the text body?