this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
7 points (100.0% liked)

movies

1802 readers
286 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

πŸ”Ž Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Unfortunately, the film hasn’t exactly been accepted with open arms, with some members of the original movie even speaking out against it, which came as a surprise to producer Molly Hassell.

β€œIt should make people proud,” Hassell told THR. β€œI’m surprised it hasn’t made the original filmmakers more proud, because it’s a step in a different direction, but it’s a necessary step to deal with the age-old themes of love and loss.β€œ

This is the only bit of new news. The article then digs up older comments from the original film's director Alex Proyas and another screenwriter both being critical of this new version.

I'm willing to give the new version a chance but the way these articles are worded, it feels like they're willing the new version to fail regardless. I have a gut feeling this film won't do very well and then hit streaming services quite quickly.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Can't wait for us to finish remaking every film, so we can start remaking the remakes. Fucking write a new movie, bunch of actual hacks

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Freaky Friday (2018) is a remake of Freaky Friday (2003) which was a remake of Freaky Friday (1976) which was an adaptation of the book Freaky Friday (1972).

Thankfully though Freaky Friday (2018) is no longer canon as Freakier Friday (2025) is a sequel to Freaky Friday (2003).

Oh and don't forget about Disney's Freak Friday (1995) which was made for TV and premiered on ABC.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Oh god I hate it πŸ˜‚

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Hollywood has been profiting off of remakes basically from the very beginning. Here's a short list of some of the most popular. And before movies, you might be shocked to learn that stage performers regularly "remade" productions originally performed by other groups. Anyone performing Hamlet or that Scottish play after The Globe burned downed is a fucking hack apparently.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

This list has Blade Runner 2049 listed as a remake??? Did I miss something when I watched it??

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I found out recently that Anyone But You was just a remake of Much Ado About Nothing, which I mean... Is there anything Will Shakespeare hasn't touched!?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I was 100% unaware this was days from launching. I've seen no advertisements or trailers. The fact that they aren't marketing this should say enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

β€œWhy don’t they like it when we dig up Brandon Lee and take a shit in his mouth?” /s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

uhg just no. the chance this movie has anything to say, and a good way to say it is practically zero. numerous writers and directors, years in the making. no one has vision of something interesting here... this is a cash grab using the original as a springboard.

gross, and not in a good way.

ill watch it, and i will be very critical. the original is an iconic piece of artwork oozing its source material. i cant imagine this will be worth the download.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

100% agree about being critical.

But I'm still gonna watch it and have high expectations AND be optimistic because of skarsgard and FKA twigs. Which if it's bad, will make the disappointment even worse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I would love for it to be good but between this, the trailers, and the feeling that the character is deeply rooted in 90s grunge rock, I just can't imagine this living up to the original.

Skarsgard is amazing, but I don't know if this is going to work out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Well guys, as this article states, it looks like Borderlands all over again. It'll probably be on streaming by the end of the week! 😜

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

It looks like Jared Leto's reimagination of The Crow.

Why can't people come up with original ideas?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

His haircut bugs me

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

if you remade a clockwork orange with alex as a fan of my chemical romance instead of beethoven nobody would be convinced by your 'it's a new interpretation of the book' defence either

that said i read somewhere that the trailer music isn't the same as the actual soundtrack. so maybe it mightn't be that bad. but he still looks like an emo twink joker

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

So Jared Leto's joker

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Can't they just write a new fucking movie? Does every god dam movie coming out need to be a remake or reboot or a movie based on a book or TV show?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm kinda confused. Why do so many people (including this article) treat this as a reboot of the first movie, when the creatives have said that it's another adaptation of the original graphic novel? And why is everyone suddenly so protective of the legacy of Brandon Lee, when there's already been a direct sequel to his movie and a separate TV series?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

i think largely because it's called 'the crow' rather than 'the crow: straight to video' or similar colon title. none of the sequels or spinoffs or whatever they were affected the cult following of the original film/books because nobody gave a shit if they'd even heard of them in the first place, curiosities at best. this one has some real money/clout behind it and is consequentially more disruptive