this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
153 points (100.0% liked)

news

23494 readers
630 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I feel like this falls under the “life” part of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”

Also, in a broader sense, “we can shit everywhere all we want and never clean up” is a criminally idiotic way to govern

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago

maybe-later-honey founding fathers didn't explicitly say where to shit so our hands are tied

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

But there is a line in the constitution mentioning the government's duty to provide for the general welfare.

Not that any of this shit matters but still

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

no more half measures walter

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That phrase is not in the constitution tho. It was a line from the DOI at the start of the revolution and isn’t actually binding to the current American federal government.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting. I continue not to give a shit about the constitution.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The US is the only country I know of that fetishises it's constitution to this extent. Most everywhere else it's just an old document, but it seems like us lawmakers treat it like some demonic pact that has to be inscrutably followed

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's also really weird how the highest court in the land is supposed to be dedicated to interpreting the constitution and extrapolating whether the founding fathers would have supported or opposed something fucking 250 years ago. Other countries rewrite parts of their constitutions all the time, but in burgerland George Washington is a deity that supposedly knew it all.

Also, America has the second oldest working constitution in the world which (only beaten by a microstate), which is kinda crazy for how young the country is

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the difference between a lawyer and a demon? Idk

Both make pacts and contracts. Both honor the verbiage of the contract to the letter over the intent. Both will cost you dearly. Both generally only show up uninvited or when something bad happens. Both take benefit from others' misfortune.

I can't tell the difference.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A demon fucks you, a lawyer fucks you. That's the real difference I think

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Biden is the more competent fascist we were warned about. Capital will get its way regardless of which major political party is running the country.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

there's only been competent fascists and incompetent fascists for the last few decades at least, Trump was merely so incompetent that it temporarily broke the grand spell before the government used the Men in Black memory deletion thingy and everybody went "Awesome, back to brunch!" on January 20th, 2021

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not everything in the universe is enumerated in the constitution you psychotic robot

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

um, excuse me, i've been told it is the greatest document ever written and handed directly from god to george washington so get rekt leftists

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

Excuse me sir but the constitution is like the bible part 2 but better

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

They know that. The argument is purely opportunist.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We only ever hear how "the sacred texts" prohibit things when they would be tangibly good.

PATRIOT Act was ruled unconstitutional fucking forever ago, but you know.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Novel way to teach children that the constitution ain’t shit.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They threw it in the blender after national-mourning-period

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

From the beginning.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the Biden administration’s June 22 court filing, Justice Department lawyers argued that because the child plaintiffs are not the only people who will be harmed by ecological breakdown, the suit should be thrown out.

“The state of the climate is a public and generalized issue, and so interests in the climate are unlike the particularized personal liberty or personal privacy interests of individuals the Supreme Court has previously recognized as being protected by fundamental rights,” the Justice Department wrote.

biden You see, this is going to kill everyone so your individual concerns about being killed are invalid

joker-amerikkklap

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

“They're trying to kill me," Yossarian told him calmly.

"No one's trying to kill you," Clevinger cried.

"Then why are they shooting at me?" Yossarian asked.

"They're shooting at everyone," Clevinger answered. "They're trying to kill everyone."

"And what difference does that make?”

― Joseph Heller, Catch-22

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

so, they're arguing for a new amendment, right?

they're arguing for a new amendment, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, thank god the document was written to protect us from the transport of alcohol, but not to say, ensure we actually get to be alive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

biden-alert HARM REDUCTION biden-alert

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

We can’t do anything the slavers from 250 years ago didn’t tell us to do

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

"There is no constitutional right to a stable climate" is giving me some real "There are things more important than peace" vibes

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Capitalists really out there trying to pick a fight with the climate, you can't drone strike a hurricane Brandon

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

With our current tech, but with our future tech that doesn't exist not even in theory, it will be possible in 2030

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looking forward to them shooting sulphur into the clouds to cool down the atmosphere

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I have the white paper for my "nuke the sahara until the temperature comes down" right here.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

Excuses for the lack of terror zero-0

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Joe Biden's DOJ is claiming bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought it was an Onion article for a second

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Making our comrades work over there even harder.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That sure is a useful document for the US Oligarchs

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There are two classes. The Haves and The Have Nots. The Haves of yore created a document that enshrines the rights of The Haves, the same document creates a system of judgement that refers to the enshrined rights of The Haves when deciding matters of conflict between The Haves and The Have Nots. Infighting between The Haves is largely inconsequential, they’ll never infringe on the sovereign rights of The Haves. Infighting between The Have Nots is also largely inconsequential, they don’t have the ability within the system to infringe on the sovereign rights of The Haves.

The constitution solely exists to safeguard the sovereign rights of The Haves against the encroachment of The Have Nots.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Chapter 1. Bourgeois and Proletarians.

The history of all hitherto existing societies is the history of class struggles. Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended, either in a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes.

marx

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Sure am glad some 200+ year old piece of paper (that still legalised slavery) isn't the deciding factor on what is and isn't moral to do or what a democratic representative has to do in order to be a caretaker of the will of their constituency. Sure am glad that we can all agree it doesn't matter what the constitution says, our government are still obligated to combat climate change and ensure a livable climate for all. So happy the constitution doesn't actually mean shit.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Each day it becomes more absurd that people just roll with this bullshit lol

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

W for accelerationists

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Our constitution applies globally and there is no constitutional right to amend it, Jack!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"If the constitution you followed brought you to this, of what use is the constitution?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Life, liberty, and the pursuit of total annihilation.

picard-annoyed

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

the 80 year old harm redoocer

joever biden-alert biden-the-thing biden-forgor biden-rember biden-point biden-troll DaBiden biden-fall biden-harbinger biden-leftist biden-nibble biden

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Some terminal stage actually lethal reddit-logo style technically correct pedantic bullshit.

"Right to life" in the Constitution doesn't matter if it infringes on the liberty of corpos to kill us all in their pursuit of happiness. capitalist-laugh this-is-fine

load more comments
view more: next ›