The screenshot is just an appetizer

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 74 points 3 years ago (13 children)

Dude's actually using vote manipulation bots like a redditor lmao.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    another account in that thread is using the same pictures. There is no fucking way two people in the same thread think that unironically replying with those pictures is some kind of massive own. For my own sanity, they NEED to be sockpuppets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 45 points 3 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children)
  • [–] 58 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    shoutouts to the past few days of hexbears getting 10-15 upbears within seconds of posting lmao

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 67 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Has anyone hit him with a fallacy fallacy yet?

    That type really hates that the fallacy fallacy exists.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    the guy seethed so hard that he had to bust out 7 alt accounts to cope

    think he's dead already yall, no need to keep beating the corpse

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 67 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    excellent cherry picking

    excellent cherry picking

    I still can't get over this fucking graphic lol

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 60 points 3 years ago

    You know what is a winning strategy in online arguments? Breaking out the debate club rules. Works every time.

  • source
  • [–] 58 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I activate my trap card! Fallacy Fallacy!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 3 years ago
    [–] 47 points 3 years ago

    You didn't disprove my argument because (fallacy that can be applied to nearly anything), that means I win! smuglord

  • source
  • [+] 44 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)
    [–] 42 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    What the heck is going on in there?!

    I thought the one I pulled was a bit account but he’s mod in the Star Trek comm!

    Wesley isn’t supposed to be an aspirational figure!

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 41 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    I saw this in the wild, he posted like 3 or 4 of those lame fallacy nerd explainers. There was another person in the dame thread doing the same thing

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    99% of the time someone cries about being strawmanned they either are backpedalling or just suck at expressing themselves

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 3 years ago* (20 children)

    No link, reported for rule 1.

    And if you add the link, I'll report for brigading instead, as per:

    Do not directly link to comments or posts of other federated instances on public posts with intent to goad or mock.

    meow-shining

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 3 years ago

    this man is the political version of a flash grenade being thrown into a library

  • source
  • [+] 35 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 33 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    we need our own debate pervert emoji

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 30 points 3 years ago

    I'd like to see some evidence that they weren't there to pee before I make up my mind.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago*

    Every other post I see from Risky Dickhole contains some Sesame Street infographic on how to best dine on his shit.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Oh shit. I just realized this is the person who has been telling me I need psychiatric help. Man if only he knew.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 25 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Um, it didn't have an "um" beginning, didn't even add "honestly" as a filler word, and no one was checkmated.

    Insufficiently reddit-logo . Checkmate. very-intelligent

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 25 points 3 years ago

    ahh, I see you know your pee pee from your poo poo

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›