this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
561 points (95.9% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3486 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

She’s already broken barriers, and now Kamala Harris could shatter several more after President Joe Biden abruptly ended his reelection bid and endorsed her.

Biden announced Sunday that he was stepping aside after a disastrous debate performance catalyzed fears that the 81-year-old was too frail for a second term. 

Harris is the first woman, Black person or person of South Asian descent to serve as vice president. If she becomes the Democratic nominee and defeats Republican candidate Donald Trump in November, she would be the first woman to serve as president. 

Biden said Sunday that choosing Harris as his running mate was “the best decision I’ve made” and endorsed her as his successor.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 135 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Nothing would irk Trump more than getting beat by a black woman.

[–] [email protected] 92 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't care if it pisses him off. I just want him to lose.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I mean, it's not the most important thing... But would it cause me joy? Yes.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Man. What a sweet thought. He’d probably have an aneurism.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Progressives should vote for her just to spite Hillary. Lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 77 points 2 months ago (2 children)

TBH statements like this are hurting her odds more than helping. Everybody on board already knows those things about her, nothing about her policies.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (5 children)

American people are notoriously uninterested in policy when it comes to presidents in the general election. they elected W (with a minority) because they felt they could have a beer with him. they elected Obama for change, him being smart, a good orator, relatively young and black was a huge contrast to everything W was. they elected TFG (with a minority) because they thought he was an outsider. they elected Biden because he wasn't TFG.

but yes they should promote Harris' policies more because they aren't bad.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I think its less about changing the odds, and more about giving a needed morale boost to two minority groups long oppressed by politics in general.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (5 children)

You should probably be worried about our odds at this point in the game. We can celebrate her traits when she's in.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Honestly more amped up more than ever that there’s a nominee under 60. God bless Biden for everything. That old turd Trump should realize he’s too old and drop out too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Let’s maybe not focus solely on this, instead maybe on policy? Real problems Americans are facing every day is going to win more votes. Making the entire campaign about gender issues isn’t alone going to win shit.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly, she has been shadowing an all-around decent president for the last 3ish years and like Obama, has the legal chops to back it up. Im not a fan of her stances from her DA days, but I dont think there is anyone else more qualified to do the job.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You can bet Republicans are gonna make her race and gender an issue though

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

If elections were based on policy the GOP would have ceased to exist four days into Reagan's presidency.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Will she earn votes? Gonna have to do some work.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Someone asked me what I thought about Biden dropping out. I said, it doesn't matter. I am over policy, specifically NOT horrible policies like Project 2025.

So... like... what policies do you support?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I would love to have her lead the country!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've seen her on TV before. But I didn't know she was black before today.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Her dad is Jamaican and her mom is Indian. Her dad might be half black, I'm not sure. I keep seeing republican memes saying she's not black or 25% black. Just endless memes trying to attack her on anything they can. Like, that's not even important, we have a real competent candidate and that's more than I can say about Dump.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

It is weird to call her black, she's as much Indian as she is African. It's like the racist "1 drop" thing, where if you have any black ancestors you are defacto black, except in this case supposedly woke people are using it as a selling point

load more comments
view more: next ›