146
submitted 2 years ago by nekandro@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] anachronist@midwest.social 69 points 2 years ago

I mean yeah I don't think Chinese companies are going to have crowdstrike installed given that it's essentially a rootkit controlled by an American company. It'd be like American companies installing Kaspersky or Xuexi Qiangguo.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

also are we to believe china never has any outages of their own?

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

It helps when a country has a simple law like segmentation fault on the prod server means jail time

/jk

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago

I mean anyone who didn't use crowdstrike was fine.

I think it would have been a more interesting comparison if windows itself shipped a broken update to everyone which would show the OS dependency of every country.

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 13 points 2 years ago

Would be interesting but I don't think than can happen as windows updates are phased. If lots of pcs start crashing, the rollout is halted

[-] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 13 points 2 years ago

This is very standard across most large scale updates, crowdstrike just does things differently obviously 🤣

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 years ago

That's just called Update Tuesday.

[-] warlaan@feddit.org 40 points 2 years ago

I doubt that this move has made them much more "safe and controllable", it just means that they depend on a different system. I mean as soon as a bug pops up in their software the rest of the world will be fine.

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

That’s not a USA vs China thing, I work in enterprise cloud, we use Linux.

[-] logging_strict@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Can/do all your coworkers use git? Even the secretary and janitor?

[-] Laser@feddit.org 6 points 2 years ago

The answer to this 100% irrelevant question is no

[-] logging_strict@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

When is collaboration irrelevant within a large organization? Your company uses Linux which is commendable.

Taking it one step further

Multiple team members being able to work on the same project at the same time

[-] Laser@feddit.org 5 points 2 years ago

My point was that it's irrelevant if the whole company knows git. We're a Microsoft shop and a lot of people don't even use computers at our company (or only sparingly as they work in manufacturing). And we also have a subset of people who work with git (me kind of included).

And no our janitor can't use AD. Even though our whole company "uses" Microsoft Windows

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Does everyone at your company use photoshop?

[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I worked in sales for a Fortune 500 tech equipment and software manufacturer. When a customer had a serious outage with a single piece of our equipment it would cause them to stop and reevaluate their purchasing plans and dependence on my company.

IMO every government and business out there is going to be looking at this at every level and IT departments will be tasked to significantly reduce their reliance on Microsoft products. It will take years to actually happen, but I think Microsoft sales are going to take a serious, long term, and well-deserved hit.

[-] peg@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

The problem is Crowdstrike, not Microsoft.

[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Makes not the least bit of difference: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/jul/20/the-microsoftcrowdstrike-outage-shows-the-danger-of-monopolization

Literally hundreds of millions of people around the world have seen the Microsoft BSODs that resulted from this fuck up. Millions of people have had their lives disrupted. The vast majority of those will blame Microsoft. Executive boards and IT groups may know better but it won't matter all that much - they will be aggressively looking to reduce their exposure to Microsoft's near monopoly anyway.

[-] logging_strict@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Darwin enters the conversation, "Ah chem!"

(raises finger) (lowers finger) (moves onto a species that can configure their own network and printer)

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 2 years ago

Tying your operating system fundamentals to proprietary network services that require active and paid-up accounts was never going to be a good idea.

[-] dephyre@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago
[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Beyond China. This incident reminded of a post by WineHQ on the danger of software monoculture.

https://wiki.winehq.org/Importance_Of_Wine

[-] logging_strict@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 years ago

China takes alot of crap from Western MSM. But the accusation that it suacks at IT, so much, would consider using WindowsOS is a low blow

Whenever see a Windows box i say, grandma gets a smartphone. Regardless who i'm talking to. Believe it!

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
146 points (85.1% liked)

World News

39242 readers
442 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS