577
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The incident in northern California marked the latest mishap blamed on the electric vehicle company's Autopilot tech

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 145 points 1 year ago

Musk did prove he doesn't know what a train is

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] [email protected] 90 points 1 year ago

Was the driver asleep or something? The car drove quite a bit on the tracks... sure, blame Tesla all you want (and rightly so), but you can't really claim today that the car has "autopilot" unless you're hunting for a lawsuit. So what was the driver doing?

[-] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's what I was thinking, your car starts doing something fucking stupid and you just let it?

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Elon take the wheel

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago

It's hard to tell who's worse at driving. Tesla owners or their auto pilot

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Who needs a driver? This car has AUTOPILOT.

But seriously, Tesla "autopilot" is nothing more than a cruise control you have to keep an eye on. Which means, it's NOT "autopilot." This technology is not ready for the real world. Sooner or later, it's going to cause a major, horrible accident, involving dozens or people. Musk has enough connections to avoid any real-world consequences but maybe enough people will get over their child-like worship of billionaires and stop treating him like he's the next Bill Gates.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Somewhat ironically, autopilot for airplanes is more less attitude/speed holding for most history. More modern systems can now autoland or follow a preprogrammed route (the flight plan plugged into the FMS), but even then changes like TCAS advisories are usually left up to the pilots to handle. Autopilots are also expected to give control to the pilots in any kind of unexpected situation.

So in a way tesla's naming here isn't so off, it's just the generic understanding of the term "autopilot" that is off somewhat. That said, their system is also not doing much more than most other level 2 ADAS systems offer.

On the other hand, Elon loves going off about Full Self Driving mode a lot, and that's absolutely bullshit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

California, so I'm I'm guessing the driver was getting head at the time whilst drinking beer.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

He was focusing on the caboose

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Even if asleep, how do you sleep through that? Would be super bumpy.

[-] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago

The Autopilot was in TRAINing mode

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

And it has a great TRACK record in training mode.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

It certainly was CHUGGING ALONG nicelly.

[-] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago

Not surprising, considering Tesla autopilot sees trains as a bunch of semis bumper to bumper.

[-] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago

The locomotives yearn for the tracks

[-] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

Further proof that America needs to invest in electrified rail

[-] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

All the "self driving" cars are trying to evolve into proper trams and railways

[-] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago

This is that "AI" that investors keep jerking themselves purple over.

Real "Self driving cars" will not be available in our lifetimes.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

self-driving vehicles have existed for decades, and they are very safe.

They are trains 🚊 / trams 🚋

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I don't believe that. Based on how far AI has come in the recent years I think it's only a matter of time before someone (other than Tesla) manages to do it well.

The biggest problem with the Tesla Auto pilot is Elon. Just the fact that he insists on using only camera-based vision because "people only need their eyes to drive" should tell you all you need to know about their AI.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

Someone accidentally included Back to the Future 3 footage in the training data.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

But only the very last scene

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Aww, it want to be train, let it be train.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

How cute, it trainsitioned

TRAINSITIONED, CORAL

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Choo Choo! Morherfuckers!!

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

This sounds like a metaphor for Elon endorsing Trump.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Driver: no Tesla that's not a road!

Tesla: YOLO!

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Roads really need a standard for sensors specifically for autopilots.

GPS and cameras reading lines, signs ,and lights aren't good.

[-] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

Yeah, like a digital "ideal line" that the cars can follow.

Maybe even a physical guiding line.

We could even connect all the cars via WLAN (WiFi) to exchange info when they are braking and accelerating. That would increase efficiency.

Maybe we could even connect them physically to have a stronger engine pulling more cars more efficiently.

If we already have an ideal guiding line, we might actually save some asphalt and make the roads more optimised. Use different materials so the tyre particles don't pollute as much.

Ah, let's just build a train.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

Or just fund public transportation instead :)

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Autopilot buses could use this too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I don't want to waste any more tax money trying to make one of the least effecient modes of transport more autonomous. Just build an electricrfied tram if thats what you want.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Eventually a great idea, but that's not rolling out particularly soon.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Hyperloop 2.0

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

News tomorrow: Police department retracts statement after Elon Musk lawsuit

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Isn't it the responsibility of the driver during autopilot?

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Human drivers have done this before. Navigation system says "turn right", they don't realise it means after the level crossing.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Hello Tesla PR department.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I just don't understand how someone can read all the warnings, get a driver's license (implying their knowledge of the rules of the road) and presumably have years of driving experience and magically think it's ok to just stop paying attention.

It doesn't matter if the car fully promotes itself as self driving, it doesn't matter if the laws surrounding it still require you to be present and in control.

It's no different than 1000hp cars, just because the car is marketed as such, doesn't magically make it legal to go 200mph.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

You don't understand why people would think that a feature called "full self-driving" is capable of fully driving the car itself?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I think it’s every responsible driver’s duty not to buy a Tesla!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
577 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

73698 readers
3549 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS