this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
7 points (81.8% liked)

NBA

5097 readers
10 users here now

East - Atlantic
Boston Celtics
Brooklyn Nets
New York Knicks
Philadelphia Sixers
Toronto Raptors
East - Central
Chicago Bulls
Cleveland Cavaliers
Detroit Pistons
Indiana Pacers
Milwaukee Bucks
East - Southeast
Atlanta Hawks
Charlotte Hornets
Miami Heat
Orlando Magic
Washington Wizards
West - Northwest
Denver Nuggets
Minnesota Timberwolves
Oklahoma City Thunder
Portland Trailblazers
Utah Jazz
West - Pacific
Golden State Warriors
Los Angeles Clippers
Los Angeles Lakers
Phoenix Suns
Sacramento Kings
West - Southwest
Dallas Mavericks
Houston Rockets
Memphis Grizzlies
New Orleans Pelicans
San Antonio Spurs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Puts the Lakers under the 2nd Apron

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So he took $3 million less to make sure Bronny got drafted. I'm going to be shocked if the kid can actually ball out.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

He took less so the team would be under the second apron, this makes it way easier to improve the roster. I don't see how Bronny plays into this?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Because he could have easily gotten a max contract on several other teams, and he made it obvious he wasn't going to stay with the Lakers if they didn't draft his son.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

he should've gone to another team

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I agree that the Lakers drafted Bronny for LeBron. LeBron didn't take a pay cut because of Bronny though. LeBron, if he wanted could have gotten a full max from the Lakers. Also Bronny is making the league minimum, not some crazy great deal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Being drafted onto LeBron James's team without being that good is a great deal. He has a congenital heart defect and 10 teams wanted him to work out for them. Do the math.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I believe you on all points, except that I'm certain he could have gotten a max contract from another team if he wanted to leave. He chose to stay with the Lakers, not for the money, but to play with his son. If the Lakers had not drafted Bronny, and another team signed him, and they also offered him a two year max contract, I bet LeBron would have taken it.

But it would have been much harder for him to negotiate that sort of deal without creating problems related to tampering. He couldn't shop around the league to find a max contract AND a team that would draft his son, but it was definitely known what his price would be. He told the Lakers to go get his son, and he would sign a team-friendly extension. I mean, it's not that much of a discount, and it puts the team in a better position financially. So there were a lot of reasons he took that contract. I just mean that there's no way he takes a pay cut if the Lakers had said "no" to Bronny.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Because Bronny got a pretty good deal. It looks likely that LeBron took a cut to give it to his son - https://nypost.com/2024/07/03/sports/bronny-james-contract-details-revealed-after-lebrons-lakers-deal/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Now he only makes 101 millions too much

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Yay for being under the second apron

Nay for getting nothing in this FA