this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
7 points (81.8% liked)
NBA
5099 readers
15 users here now
East - Atlantic |
---|
Boston Celtics |
Brooklyn Nets |
New York Knicks |
Philadelphia Sixers |
Toronto Raptors |
East - Central |
---|
Chicago Bulls |
Cleveland Cavaliers |
Detroit Pistons |
Indiana Pacers |
Milwaukee Bucks |
East - Southeast |
---|
Atlanta Hawks |
Charlotte Hornets |
Miami Heat |
Orlando Magic |
Washington Wizards |
West - Northwest |
---|
Denver Nuggets |
Minnesota Timberwolves |
Oklahoma City Thunder |
Portland Trailblazers |
Utah Jazz |
West - Pacific |
---|
Golden State Warriors |
Los Angeles Clippers |
Los Angeles Lakers |
Phoenix Suns |
Sacramento Kings |
West - Southwest |
---|
Dallas Mavericks |
Houston Rockets |
Memphis Grizzlies |
New Orleans Pelicans |
San Antonio Spurs |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I believe you on all points, except that I'm certain he could have gotten a max contract from another team if he wanted to leave. He chose to stay with the Lakers, not for the money, but to play with his son. If the Lakers had not drafted Bronny, and another team signed him, and they also offered him a two year max contract, I bet LeBron would have taken it.
But it would have been much harder for him to negotiate that sort of deal without creating problems related to tampering. He couldn't shop around the league to find a max contract AND a team that would draft his son, but it was definitely known what his price would be. He told the Lakers to go get his son, and he would sign a team-friendly extension. I mean, it's not that much of a discount, and it puts the team in a better position financially. So there were a lot of reasons he took that contract. I just mean that there's no way he takes a pay cut if the Lakers had said "no" to Bronny.