169
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago

so they prefer that users use adblockers?

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Well, no, they prefer people pay the subscription cost they set in each region.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Which they've shown they aren't willing to do...

Personally, YT premium is my only subscription I have, and wouldn't really have any others if money wasn't this tight. But I was paying before this recent anti blocker war, I prefer YT Music just because of the way it handles a bunch of the music remixed by seperate and probably not "official" artists. And with how much youtube I watch on mobile instead of my PC, messing with blocking wasn't very appealing to me, since the jump from YTmusic to full premium is less than almost any streaming sub.

But I have always watched/backgroundnoised a lot of youtube, so its not that much of pain. Realistically, this was bound to happen eventually, hosting that much content hasn't really gone down in costs as quickly as most tech overhead. But its a fairly complex line item, not just hardware & facilities, but all the law office hours related to copyright log is an ongoing and probably still growing cost for them and since they are not Disney thats a real cost I'd imagine.

As a side note, it just reminds me how shockingly unaware I am of how much they must value our personal data, that it only just now became worthwile to fight blockers with this much effort and PR/image depreciation.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

how much they must value our personal data, that it only just now became worthwile to fight blockers with this much effort and PR/image depreciation.

You got it, on the nose.

Shadow boxing is always good practice.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I know what it is, just didnt know my comment meant I was preparing to fight.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah but on one hand the price they want I'm not willing to pay, but if I could get it for less then I'd consider it.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Sounds like the service isn't quite right for you, then.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's only worth what people are willing to pay. Already have Spotify anyways and not a fan of googles app killing tactics, learned that the hard way a couple times.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Sounds like the monopolized industry isn't right for the users

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Jesus Christ google, how much money are you spending to foil 0.000034% of your user base

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

The purpose, is to keep it difficult enough that the "honest" person doesn't get the idea to start doing it.

Same concept as putting a lock on your front door. It's not to stop thieves, it's to stop the average person from getting the idea to "just take a quick look".

By occasional going after workarounds AND making it public news. Your average computer user thinks it's not worth the hassle.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

If they don't want honest people considering it, maybe they shouldn't raise the price by 80% in a single price change.

I paid for YouTube premium when it was first available. They guaranteed the price would never change as I was a first adopter. Then they did. Then they did it again. And then again.

Google can fuck off. They have all the money in the world and they need to extort the people who helped grow their business.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Luckily they can't do this in the EU. As an EU-citizen, I have the right to subscribe in Romania, for example, and pay no more than a Romanian would.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It sounds kinda illegal. Can Coca-cola stop me from going to Denmark to buy for danish prices and claim I have to pay Norwegian prices?

It’s directly comparable to buying danish subscription and using the service from a danish exit. If my data originates in china and are vpn-ed to Denmark they have the same cost on providing me service as anyone else in Denmark

Edit: I’ve never been to China, but it’s like really far away from Denmark.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

If you're a convenience store but pallets of Coca Cola, then they kind-of can. They can just blacklist you from buying Coca Cola in the foreign country.

It's also different because they're selling you continuous access one month at a time instead of a physical good you drink and they can't take away from you. I've been to places where service costs are lower for locals than for tourists, and this is told to you outright. Stuff like museums, taxis, etc. It's a similar idea YouTube has.

Prices are also almost never based on cost, they're based on what people will pay.

I live in Canada, and cars are more expensive here than in the USA. US dealerships near the border refuse to sell new cars to Canadians, even though it's legal for everyone as long as you make sure to pay duties on the way back. I'm guessing each brand has some rule against it.

Ultimately VPN users aren't a protected class so it's legal to discriminate.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I’m still not sure your car thing would match here - unless they refuse to sell you a car that you only use in the USA. I’m guessing these stores are brand owned? Why else would you refuse a sale - even if it’s useless to the buyer

I could see rights come into play - but they usually regulate within the nation.

I would think this is connected to name/address/payment not matching the country you claim to live in. If it’s VPN detection then a WiFi router doing the VPN would work fine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

In the EU, this is illegal. As an EU resident, you have the right to subscribe to any service in another EU country.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

There's probably something in the terms about it, and it would take a very expensive legal battle to settle it. And I doubt it has enough legal merit to be taken on as a class-action lawsuit.

So, really, does it matter if it's illegal? With the asymmetrical power imbalance, they literally don't need to care about the laws. Realistically, no EU regulator is going to fine them for cancelling "a purchase made in India", either.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Newpipe and its forks for the win.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I can watch Youtube without ads using an adblocker or NewPipe. Why anyone buys Premium is beyond me.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Smarttubenext. I even install it on every hotel TV I use.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Could be one of the many reasons such as ensuring their favorite creators get paid for their views and end users not being tech savvy enough to know about ad blockers and NewPipe.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I can donate. No reason for Google to get most of it.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's a good approach. But people aren't tech savvy enough to install NewPipe in order to avoid ads. Paying for YT premium is the most user friendly way to avoid ads and support creators.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Tubular is a fork of NewPipe with SponsorBlock and ReturnYouTubeDislike integration. LibreTube is another great option, which uses the Piped backend. They also have a Lemmy community, and you can check them out on Mastodon: https://fosstodon.org/@libretube

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: [email protected]

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Congrats, your subscription has been canceled

What subscription?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The ones mentioned in the headline?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Oh there goes my back up plan for server side injection ads

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I tried to get brazillian youtube premium or whatever and it just didn't work.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I did a South American country once too but the payment processor has a snafu and it stopped working after the 2nd month. I just spun up a personal invidious VM and moved on with my life.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Ok I'm using revanced anyway..

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
169 points (99.4% liked)

Android

19896 readers
220 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: [email protected]


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: [email protected]

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: [email protected]

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to [email protected].

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to [email protected].

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS