top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 114 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Wiktionary says

In the original result of the Wug Test, children consistently produced wugs for the plural. However, plurals other than the standard wugs are sometimes used humorously, including wuggen (by analogy with oxen), weeg, and wuggi (by analogy with Latinate plurals).

Wuggi sounds nice. Huggy wuggi :3

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 69 points 2 years ago* (6 children)

    My immediate thought was wug, like the plural of fish is fish.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Unless you're sleeping with them. Then it's fishes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 64 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    This test screwed me up in first grade. I thought it was some kind of grammar test so I kept asking if it was a verb, a noun, or an adverb. The test giver was some researcher and was convinced I wasn't taking the test seriously because I wouldn't say wugs. He got kind of angry and I found the whole thing to be kind of distressing. I asked to stop and he just got even angrier and said something like, "No one has ever had trouble with the wug test before". I was convinced I was bad at grammar for years after that. Anyway, wugs! =)

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    What a shite researcher. The whole point is to judge children's inferrence - that's why they don't use real words. There is no right answer. There's just an expected answer based on similar words.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

    I wouldn't be too hard on him. I was a weird kid who grew up into a weird adult. I ended up doing lots of tests as a kid with him or researchers just like him. I did the test where you're told to electrocute a person if they answer a question wrong and they pretend to scream. And the test where they use a wire to knock over water bottles. I gave weird responses to those tests as well. I just started pressing the button for the electrocution and laughing. I apologized after. And when the water bottles got knocked over I just sat there and waited for him to come back. It occurred to me that I might get in trouble, but then I figured he would just take my word on it. I was like, "Your structure fell over!". These tests make for fun stories.

    edit: With the electrocution test I definitely tried to reason with the researcher that electrocuting people wasn't scientific, but I very quickly realized he wasn't going to listen to me. I realized it was an opportunity to electrocute a person and that I was never getting another opportunity to do that ever, so I just went for it. Egg on my face when it turns out it's both not real and I'm a awful person. I did feel bad though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 59 points 2 years ago
    [–] 42 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Wugs, if its an Anglo root, unless it's derived from Latin "Wug*, wugīs" in which case there are two Wugi (wûg-eye). Unless its one of the random Latin words where we don't do that and it's still "wugs." Unless it's a loanword from germanic then we might anglicise it or we might say "wugar." Because eNgLIsH iS EaSY...

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    My daughter does the opposite in such an intelligent way. Kix cereal for example - one piece of it is a kik. And the singular for clothes is a cloe.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago
    [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This feels like a word that would be both singular and plural. Like sheep.

    Two wug.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Only if the amount of wug is a prime number.

    This is because non-prime numers of wuggi are highly unstable and will split into separate prime factors of wug if there's enough space (and in most atmospheric conditions).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] [S] 33 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Berko_Gleason

    Gleason devised the Wug Test as part of her earliest research (1958), which used nonsense words to gauge children's acquisition of morphological rules‍—‌for example, the "default" rule that most English plurals are formed by adding an /s/, /z/, or /ɪz/ sound depending on the final consonant, e.g. hat–hats, eye–eyes, witch–witches. A child is shown simple pictures of a fanciful creature or activity, with a nonsense name, and prompted to complete a statement about it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago
    [–] 14 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago
    [–] 10 points 2 years ago
    [–] 9 points 2 years ago
    [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Is this the r/linguistics logo bird

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [+] 8 points 2 years ago
    [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    There are two plimben

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago
    [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    There are two √ﷺ½⚠

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Wugim is biblically correct.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›