A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
This also explains why the Palestinians were cheering and thought the Genocide was over right before israel invaded Rafah. They truly believed that they signed a peace deal.
When the US signs off on a deal they did not expect israel to just be able to reject it. But with Biden at to top, anything goes.
With Hamas asking for guarantees that Israel withdraws from Gaza and hands back control to them, and Israel never going to accept that, the explanation given o CNN seems like the logical explanation.
MEE reporting "hey we found some Egyptians that told us Egypt would never dare do that" doesn't really add anything
However, the three Egyptian intelligence sources told MEE that Burns was among several mediators who reviewed the draft before it was sent to Israel.
So they could be lying, but MEE is saying their sources are Egyptian intelligence familiar with the negotiation. I don't think your characterization of the article is correct.
We found the Egyptian government saying this and multiple other sources and Burns did go there.
It is unlikely the Egyptian government would suddenly go rogue and change the agreement by themselves. The explanation in the article makes far more sense.
And the most telling is that Hamas did claim in Gaza there would be a ceasefire and the Palestinians in Gaza cheered about it.
Of course MEE does not have the amazing reputation of credible western outlets such as New York Times. So whatever they say can't be right
And Trump would "finish the problem" https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-israel-gaza-finish-problem-rcna141905
And Nikki Haley wrote "finish them" on an Israeli missile.
Just a reminder the GOP isn't a better option here. We need to primary out the corpos on both sides but presidentially there isn't a anti-genocide candidate that has a chance.
The rest of their politics are important as well.
Nobody's fucking saying that, Jesus Christ. We know they're equally as bad or worse, but can we please just call out democrats on their bullshit without someone going 'durr Trump worse'?
We can after November of this year. /s
Indeed. Important to keep mentioning third party is the only viable option for voters not wanting to support Genocide.
