this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
1130 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

58133 readers
4518 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 293 points 1 year ago (27 children)

Jesus, at this point over half the country will ban porn because of religious extremists who hate freedom. Fascism and anti free speech.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago (2 children)

and then those same people who want it banned close their curtains and start watching it.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like all these child protecting puritans who end up being pedophiles and sex traffickers lol

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (27 children)

Age verification for pornography has something like a 70% approval rating. It’s not a religious extremism issue, it’s a “normies don’t want or care about their freedoms issue”.

[–] [email protected] 88 points 1 year ago

I think there's a lot of vague support for keeping porn away from children that evaporates in the context of the actual issue at hand where porn sites are being mandated to collect and store the IDs of every visitor.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (30 children)

The concept is not terrible, the implementation is. Passing this law with no secure way of proving identity is where it’s clearly just a Christo-fascist power move.

[–] [email protected] 86 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think a law verifying your age over the internet inherently breaks the idea of a free internet, of which we are already seeing degradation of by Google and DRM/web integrity anyways.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

I don't see how it doesn't violate free speech. Imagine needing the government's permission to talk to someone?

Edit: forgot a word

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago

And fuck sending your driver's license to random shady porn sites

load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] [email protected] 192 points 1 year ago (29 children)

My parents had a porn blocker, and all it made me do was learn enough about computers to circumvent it. Even if they put age verification in front of every porn site in the world there's still torrents and chat rooms and forums all over where you can find it, and kids will find it. Next thing they'll mandate is putting toothpaste back in the tube.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Trying to stop people from doing something is a sure fire way to guarantee they will do that thing.

[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 year ago

It's not that. It's that if you tell a horny teenager that there's pictures of naked people somewhere they'll move heaven and earth to get to it.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Not only will they find it, they'll end up going to the sketchier sites that don't do the age verification because they're not well known enough and not following the laws and they'll likely get something infected on the computer/network or worse.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

Not only will they find it, they’ll end up going to the sketchier sites that don’t do the age verification because they’re not well known enough and not following the laws and they’ll likely get something infected on the computer/network or worse.

It's like that time we declared a war on drugs and then there were no drugs. Wait, actually that led to a massive black market and tons of violence.

Point being, you're not gonna stop it. You're just gonna make it less safe.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
[–] [email protected] 170 points 1 year ago (14 children)

America is such garbage lol. You guys should really focus on the important stuff.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (15 children)

It's garbage because brainless rednecks voted in Trump and Republicans

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We're trying, but our government won't let us.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Its full of evangelical Christians. That and Anglo-Saxon culture even minus the evangelical Christians is very squeamish around sex. Just look at the different attitude towards talking to kids about sex that you find in the UK and on the Continent, even the Germanic countries tend to be a lot more open about this stuff than the UK.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Its full of evangelical Christians.

That number has been shrinking for decades, while at the same time the christo-faccists are getting more pushy.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 169 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Religious zealots shouldn't be dictating what I watch, read or do.

[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Especially when they're watching this stuff too

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 146 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Even if there was some secure, hardened way of verifying people’s ages without handing over PII to random websites, these age verification laws are still utterly ridiculous.

It’s not the government’s job to parent your kids on the internet. If you don’t want your kids visiting specific websites or viewing specific content, you take 15 minutes out of your goddamn day to do your job as a parent, and set up a content blocker on your home network.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you take 15 minutes out of your goddamn day to do your job as a parent, and set up a content blocker on your home network.

Or, I don't know, talk to your kid?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Can't you just use a VPN to get past a content block? Sounds exactly like a project a 14 year old me would research

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Teaching the youth to protect their Internet identity feels like a win.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 112 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The sicko in me hopes they spend the next two weeks linking every policymaker in the state to their pornography habits and just dump the whole dataset online. Yeah, it would probably counterproductive and not great for democracy but I wouldn’t it be the sickest burn of all time?

[–] [email protected] 91 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Ironically it would be so much easier to do that if they actually implemented the law they're suing over, which demands they record the ID of everyone who uses the site.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Hmm, the article is a little confusing, but it sounds like they're mostly just complaining about the age verification, not really suing over that specifically. The real sticking point, and the one they actually stand a good chance of winning in court is about the warning they're being required to display that's both libelous and factually false. Texas for better or worse is within their rights to require age verification, even the very odious version of it being proposed that would require collecting state IDs, so it's unlikely that they would actually win if that was their only issue with the law. Fortunately Texas (and others) massively overstepped by trying to slap a health and safety warning a la cigarette packages onto porn sites since they let a bunch of nutty politicians write the text of the message rather than actual medical professionals (probably because they couldn't find any respectable medical professional that would endorse their wacky notions).

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I think a lot of these states are going about this wrong. We should be helping parents restrict access for their children rather than trying to verify identities of adults who likely want to remain anonymous.

[–] [email protected] 86 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I am pretty sure these laws have nothing to do with "protecting children"

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"You show me some lazy prick who's laying around all day watching game shows and stroking his penis and I'll show you someone who's not causing any fucking trouble"

-George Carlin

Republicans really believe shit like this and banning abortion will be successful at restoring the nuclear family... at gunpoint.

What it will really do is increase sexual assault, suicide, violence in general...

Of course that will be everyone else's fault for not submitting to their attempts at coercion correctly. Republicans insist on personal responsibility, exclusively for their many enemies and explicitly not for themselves.

The funniest bit is, they are the reason for the death of the nuclear family and the reason it won't be restored. If you give the owner class all the money out of the asses of the working citizens that would have kids, herp derp they won't have kids.

If they really wanted the "traditional American family" to come back, they need only restore tax levels to pre-reagan levels, and actually enforce them. Instead they'd rather threaten everyone for masturbating instead of making new wage slaves they can't afford to raise so Republicans can also get that dopamine hit of schadenfreude by calling them irresponsible for having kids they can't afford.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You want to restore the nuclear family? Make it financially viable for us to have one.

One of the main reasons I don’t have children is because it’s too goddamn expensive.

Also I’m sterile. But there’s nothing anyone can do about that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago

Guess a state with a big enough user base finally tried this horse shit lol.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Porn hub should make a VPN and offer it for free to people in texas They could call it VaginaPenisNards

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago

They offer a VPN called VPNhub

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Republican states really want everyone to be as miserable as possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›