top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 129 points 2 years ago (3 children)

When I read the headline I briefly imagined a world where people who bought new cars were statutorily required to honk at other drivers for their driving.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 37 points 2 years ago

    I was SO torn on posting this to the Not The Onion community for that reason. I find the headline hilarious (as evidenced by me commenting "HONK" throughout this comment section)

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 127 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    What I’m reading is that every car will have to be equipped with functioning GPS that’s going to check against a database of speed limits.

    —Speed limits that can change and be out of date. —GPS data that could be stored and extracted from the dealership and sold or given to the government, insurance companies, and law enforcement. —GPS data that could be sent in real time if the car has a cellular connection or hijacks the cellular connection in your phone when you connect it to the car.

    This is bad. Really really bad.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I agree with your first point, but the latter two:

    —GPS data that could be stored and extracted from the dealership and sold or given to the government, insurance companies, and law enforcement. —GPS data that could be sent in real time if the car has a cellular connection or hijacks the cellular connection in your phone when you connect it to the car.

    Why do you think this is more likely to happen with this new regulation, when most modern cars already have a functioning GPS module for navigation and cellular connection for software updates?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

    It's the standardizing that worries me. When it's required, people probably aren't going to be able to truly turn off their GPS (maybe this is already a thing, I don't know).

    Edit: And when it's classified as a safety feature, it will [most likely] be illegal to disable, making car owners criminals if they refuse to be tracked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 65 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    There are definitely areas of California where going less than 10 miles over the speed limit will put you well under the flow of traffic in every lane. If you're not going 80 on 80, you're gonna have a bad time.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 51 points 2 years ago (23 children)

    I don't really care about the honking so much as I do the fact that this mandates that the car track its position.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago* (18 children)

    “[an] integrated vehicle system that uses, at minimum, the GPS location of the vehicle compared with a database of posted speed limits, to determine the speed limit, and utilizes a brief, one-time visual and audio signal to alert the driver each time they exceed the speed limit by more than 10 miles per hour.”

    Honestly the only part of this that is unreasonable is that it isn't immediately followed with "the database updates will be maintained and provided in an open, unencrypted format for free for the life of the vehicle, and the tracking data cannot be used for any other purpose". GPS is a one-way, triangulation-based signal. It doesn't inherently track or leak anything. I think we would be a lot safer if we all could agree what speed to go.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    I think we would all be safer if we recognized individual competence and attention as the key ingredient in safety, and stopped trying to replace human attention with an ever-expanding set of sensors and woefully inadequate algorithms for determining whether the driver is being safe.

    Like, if they have to model the driver as someone who’s not paying attention, then the whole design philosophy of the car is fucked, and we’re designing for failure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I agree. And the whole design philosophy of the car was fucked when manufacturers were allowed to build SUVs and oversized trucks that weigh 2+ tons and don’t require any additional certification or licensure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago*

    The statistics around accidents with large vehicles like that are less about their operation and more that they exist at all. Accidents will always happen, certification or no. The issue is someone struck by one will be more likely to sustain heavier or critical injuries, and smaller cars offer less protection for their passengers when hit by heavier vehicles.

    So rather than "you can use one of these completely unnecessary vehicles if you pass a test once", they should just be outlawing them all together as basic consumer vehicles. If they aren't being designed for specific utilities or business purposes, you can't make them and sell them to just anyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 48 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Our GPS often shows the incorrect speed limit.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 43 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Headline is misleading. This only passed the state Senate. It has not passed the state assembly yet. It also would need to be signed by the governor if it does pass in the assembly.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 40 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    What will it use to determine where you are and what the speed limit is?

    Google maps? Apple maps? Is there some government mapping service with speed limits that are updated based on construction?

    Can I turn it off when it is constantly wrong on rural roads?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I think a lot of modern cars recognise the speed signs with cameras

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 36 points 2 years ago

    Someone driving at an unsafe speed? How about some distractions, that should work out great!

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Beep beep!

    Car, I'm on the highway! I know GPS drifted a bit, but I'm not on the residential road next to the highway that has a 25 mph speed limit, I'm on the highway with a speed minimum of 45 mph!

    Beep beep!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 29 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It not the job of citizens to enforce the law but I guess cops are too busy murdering citizens.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Haha this will make using car alerts completely meaningless

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    My car beeps at me if j go the wrong way down a 1 way street. Of course it hasn't updated the maps of the area where i live in at least 10 years so it just beeps constantly.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Is this about speeding?

    Or is this about getting every car to broadcast it's location data?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    The car has to track your location and regularly download the local speed limits so it knows when you are speeding? Bet it's uploading your location too. This is way invasive and not just annoying.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    Enshittification is hitting every part of society...

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Mine does this, but it's a user configurable speed limit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 14 points 2 years ago
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The light repeating ding of the AE86 after it screeches around every corner

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    this is hilarious, and i support this just for the absolute chaos it will create

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I'm surprised California dealerships aren't on top of this as a huge threat to their industry. Everyone will want to buy a car out of state.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 10 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    So this turns every car on the road into a speed sensor yes? And then the cops use that aggregate data to feed cops info to inform speed traps and collect ticket quotas

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (9 children)

    Literally impossible unless the cars have some kind of tracking software to monitor location.

    and you know if its doing that, its not doing it without leaking your data to law enforcement and advertisers.

    So, yeah, no thanks. Train cops to do their actual, legitimate jobs instead of letting them waste their time with actual fucking inhuman torture, and the issue would also be solved. and in the right way, instead of the invasive privacy destroying way.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›