you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 26 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I agree with your first point, but the latter two:

—GPS data that could be stored and extracted from the dealership and sold or given to the government, insurance companies, and law enforcement. —GPS data that could be sent in real time if the car has a cellular connection or hijacks the cellular connection in your phone when you connect it to the car.

Why do you think this is more likely to happen with this new regulation, when most modern cars already have a functioning GPS module for navigation and cellular connection for software updates?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

    It's the standardizing that worries me. When it's required, people probably aren't going to be able to truly turn off their GPS (maybe this is already a thing, I don't know).

    Edit: And when it's classified as a safety feature, it will [most likely] be illegal to disable, making car owners criminals if they refuse to be tracked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    To calculate a speed, you need 2 different locations at some time delta (2 different times). How is recording locations, even just 2 over the span of some time delta, not "tracking"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments