this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
81 points (100.0% liked)

Movies & TV

22858 readers
80 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

INSIDE SCOOP

I have a friend whose parent is in the publishing industry, in which J.KKK. Rowling's bigotry was apparently an open secret years before she started to show her whole deal publicly.

Essentially, people inferred quite a bit based on the authors she would and wouldn't do blurb quotes for. Similar pattern for interviews, willingness to read review copies, etc etc.

From what they told me, the transphobia is the tip of iceberg (not to downplay the evil she is causing to trans people in the slightest). The woman is a deeply disturbed bigot, but holds (most) of these beliefs private, expressing them through 'the notes she doesn't play' as it were. The transphobia only became public (my conjecture) because she found them vulnerable enough to make those beliefs explicit.

All of this makes me deeply suspicious of her motivations for the occasional lib diversity pandering she engaged in. Black!Hermione, Gay!Dumbledore, etc, as smokescreen or even chud provocation.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It continues to shock me how willing she is to destroy her image just to publically be a bigot. She could've fucked off to wherever to do anything she wanted after publishing Harry Potter and been remembered as a beloved children's author yet she chose to be transphobic on twitter.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Rich people must just get so bored and attention starved. Not condoning but she could've just continue to be a bigot in private among friends and maintained a public image and we'd be none the owiser. She killed her own legacy. Actually wish she'd just sell Harry Potter to Warner Brothers and go away.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Took long enough

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago