this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
544 points (97.9% liked)

World News

38970 readers
2969 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Russian President Vladimir Putin can choose not to hold presidential elections next year because he will “obviously” win re-election, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said late Sunday.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 120 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That he will win them is indeed obvious. Since there have not been fair elections in Russia for quite some time, one cannot expect these to be fair.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, any relevant opposition tends to end up poisoned or jailed or both.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey now, windows and balconies were doing the heavy lifting (dropping?) earlier this year. Must have been a shortage in poison due to the embargos.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not having elections would make it more transparent to what is going on though. It should not be in Putin's favour to just stop having them. Maybe he can't afford the bill of having one this time.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

What transparency do you want after all those jailings and murders?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

There is also the added cost of rigging all those machines and stuffing the ballot boxes.

[–] [email protected] 106 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m surprised he waited so long, honestly. all this tip-toeing around rigged elections and shoving his political opponents out of windows into cups of polonium tea is lot of work for a guy who has to shop for gigantic conference tables all day and poop into a collection bag for his secret service guys to catalogue for whatever reason. when you combine all of that with his busy schedule of genociding Ukranians, well… obviously, one of those activities will to have to go. an evil autarch has only so much time in the day!

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think at this moment, there could be protests even with a rigged election. Take away the election entirely and maybe it's a lower chance of protests. No opposition to galvanize around, etc.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Kind of hard to be sarcastic when thinking about that

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

That's when they stop pretending.

[–] [email protected] 94 points 1 year ago (3 children)

republicans creaming their pants rn.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

They're taking notes!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Fucking lmaooo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It would be a “technical violation” of constitution, which apparently is not a crime.

\s

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Special election operation

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

These people loves rules and laws, except of course if it applies to them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I think I understood that this was a reference to that other, very free country (the freeestest of all), where that previous president did...things.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago

He has achieved conservatism's natural final form of "leadership".

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think at this point he knows that he can do fuck all without any Russian uprising.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IMO we're more likely to see Russia break into a pile of separate republics than a big unified uprising. Maybe that pile of republics gets unified by a new dictator or Putin, maybe not. As it is, the core Russian ethnic group is shrinking while several of the other ethnicities are growing within their respective regions.

Eventually the Russians won't have enough young men to conscript and continue maintaining control of their already massive territory, which will lead to existing regional governments declaring independence while Russia proper will be able to do fuck all about it unless they wanna start nuking their neighbors.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Russia break into a pile of separate republic is practically impossible, as it will cause colossal pain for literally all states. It is much easier to negotiate with one dictator with a nuclear button than with twenty.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Look, I'm not arguing what I think makes sense for people to do, I'm thinking about how people in large groups tend to act, regardless of whether it's logical. Competing for power is inevitable whenever a centralized system can't maintain outright dominance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

“Our presidential election is not really democracy [...]"

Well, duh!

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Russian President Vladimir Putin can choose not to hold presidential elections next year because he will “obviously” win re-election, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said late Sunday.

I agree, why even bother?

If the russian population is eating the bullshit thrown before them, why hold elections... Save yourself the hassle and stop pretend to be a democracy.

And yeah, I imagine the TRUMP-MAGA-GOP is cumming right in their pants without even touching when Putin actually just calls of the elections.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Putin is widely expected to declare his bid for a sixth overall presidential term.

Oh, his "bid"? Is he gonna roll those dice one more time? See if he breaks lucky?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A "bid" would entail something like "chance". And that chance would not depend on the citizens, but on his cronies...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

100% chance is still a chance

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

At least he should pretend to get the 101% of the votes

Too lazy

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So, what happened with not serving more than 2 consecutive terms in Russia? Was it already removed?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

yeah when he became president again 6 years ago.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

guess he doesn't want to be prime minister again

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Well, in 2020 he did make it law that he was dictator for life. So, what's the point of going through the motions anymore?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Don't feel bad for the Russian people.

They deserve this shit for putting up with this year after year as they could clearly see him grabbing more and more power. If they revolted against him 10 or even 15 years ago when he had a fraction of the power that he does now, it never would have gotten so bad and this pointless war in Ukraine might have never happened.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

That shithole is nothing but a Potemkin country.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

He's afraid Prigozhin will run.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Ahh, I see Russia is playing Tropico in real life

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

all the manpower they would use to rig the elections is lying in ditches in Ukraine

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When was the last time they actually held a real election???

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Back in '03

1803 that is.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

We’ll when you jailed your political rival for 10 years why have one?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'm actually curious how open and fair elections would play out in Russia. I think he would probably still win comfortably if only for the limited amount of information a lot of Russians get. Hell, apparently even toilets are a luxury there.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Republican party leadership like

https://tenor.com/IvPt.gif

load more comments
view more: next ›