this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

philosophy

19786 readers
13 users here now

Other philosophy communities have only interpreted the world in various ways. The point, however, is to change it. [ x ]

"I thunk it so I dunk it." - Descartes


Short Attention Span Reading Group: summary, list of previous discussions, schedule

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Also, I don't just mean they are reactionary in certain area or in their personal life (Like Aristotle was important for biology despite being an apologies for slavery)?

I mean worth looking into their thinking precisely in areas where they're reactionary.

Possible suggestions (not saying they're justified) that I expect people would put forward include:

  • Carl Scmitt
  • Heidegger
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yukio Mishima is a wonderful novelist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

And the Paul Schrader movie about his life is my favourite film. Beautifully shot dissection of the pathologies that made him a fascist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Nietzsche. He's a reactionary but he diagnoses some of the problems of modernity correctly. He articulates the appeal of the heroic or mythic and the dearth of that in bourgeois society. The Ubermensch (not necessarily the Nazi ideal) is a reactionary response to the crisis of the death of God that needs to be overcome (ironically, I can't think of a better term off the top of my head than 'overcome', so even in my critique I'm still operating within Nietzschean terms).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I enjoyed Mishima Yukio when I was younger, almost as a morbid fascination/character study. As a non-western nationalist, he wasn't happy with American hegemony/occupation, including the use of Japan as a staging ground for the Korean War ("It was supposed to be our turn to bomb Korea"). Unlike the American conservatives I was used to, he had an actual culture to write about, so he could write florid prose about some aspect of Japanese culture and talk about how it's being destroyed by neoliberalism and it's a little bit more reasonable than the things the American right whines about (though it's important to remember that his cause was abhorrent and fascist).

A lot of his writing subverted my expectations of what the right could look like - though I encountered him before the Alt-Right was a thing. In some ways, I feel like he prepared me for the Alt-right. He was all about the Chad meme and bodybuilding and strong muscular men, he was (most likely) gay, and in one of his novels the protagonist cucks the imperial prince (despite Mishima's affection for imperial rule). A lot of the Milo Yiannopoulos-type bits and subversiveness and attempts at third-positionism were kinda like :seen-this-one:

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Von Clausewitz, Dostoevsky, Limonov, Tolstoy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Russia has a fantastic literary canon

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Most Chinese are Russian Simps

Yes I’m Chinese