this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

philosophy

19789 readers
2 users here now

Other philosophy communities have only interpreted the world in various ways. The point, however, is to change it. [ x ]

"I thunk it so I dunk it." - Descartes

Short Attention Span Reading Group: summary, list of previous discussions, schedule

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
2
Which Reactionary Thinkers are Worth Reading Despite their Reactionary Ideas? (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Also, I don't just mean they are reactionary in certain area or in their personal life (Like Aristotle was important for biology despite being an apologies for slavery)?

I mean worth looking into their thinking precisely in areas where they're reactionary.

Possible suggestions (not saying they're justified) that I expect people would put forward include:

  • Carl Scmitt
  • Heidegger
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Von Clausewitz, Dostoevsky, Limonov, Tolstoy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Russia has a fantastic literary canon

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Most Chinese are Russian Simps

Yes I’m Chinese