this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
35 points (100.0% liked)

commrequest

1531 readers
4 users here now

Community and moderator requests and nominations for unmodded communities.

No bulk requests. That means one comm request per post. This is so we can sort out their interest individually.

Community request posts with enough upbears and a volunteer for moderation willing to submit an application will be created during mod drives.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's fine if the dunk tank doesn't want to be a place where we get mad at insignificant reactionary nerds, I love that for them. But for those of us who LIKE getting mad at insignificant reactionary nerds, we need a containment zone for those kinds of posts, otherwise folks are just going to get shit removed from dunk tank / cth / main all the time.

Enter, chapodunkhouse. It's exactly the same as the dunk tank, except we can keep dunking on folks whose opinions don't matter to anyone who matters.

I think the rules should be:

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow chapos.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Anyway I'm happy to mod this with anyone else who wants to mod this, including any of the mods of the dunk tank since they already are doing a great job moderating it outside of the new Rule 8.

Also yes this is a serious comm request I'm not shitposting. I like dunking on random libs and I know lots of others do too.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (4 children)

It doesn't even seem like the dunk tank doesn't want to be a place for mocking random nerds, it seems like one mod doesn't want it to be that and decided to unilaterally make the change.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago

It was discussed between the mods, not a unilateral decision.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hexbear moderation doesn’t work unilaterally. This isn’t Reddit where mods will just get randomly appointed and won’t necessarily have an expectation of coordinating with each other.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

This sounds pretty unilateral to me:

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And when asked how the dunk tank wouldn't basically just be another c/CTH, there's no satisfactory answer as to what the point of that comm is to be from here either. Like what, you're gonna use it two to three times a year for what few times cracker shitheads act up on Twitter and forget about it the rest of the year? Tuh.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

c/CTH is a general shitposting comm and isn't a space for dunking on bad takes. The goal of the rule change for c/T_D_T is to reduce low hanging fruit posts so we're not just getting mad at fake stuff or one random dude posting garbage into the void.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Where would something like this get posted, or would it not be allowed on the site any more?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Not allowed on the site for at least a couple days. Smh someone just posted it. /joke

But seriously, that would still be allowed here. Tesla doofuses are a form of Actually Existing Idiocy. Again, we're actually just trying to reduce the dunking on random anonymous posters who say weirdo shit nobody agrees with and have no audience. If they have an audience or it's a somewhat common take, that should continue to be allowed.

We have better wording!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I elaborated more on this in the actual rule change thread, but could we have an exception for dunking on posts and comments in close proximity to Hexbear? Like shitty posts on federated instances wherein some chud or lib is either mentioning Hexbear or posting a direct reply to a Hexbear user? Most of the instances we're federated are small enough that they'd probably never cross the threshold into whatever number of upvotes is required, but they'd still be a ton more relevant to dunk on than a random nobody on another site entirely.

I feel allowing this is in Hexbear's best interest considering it makes chud and libs think twice about whether it's worth posting chud shit on our federation network.

EDIT: Looks like this idea was approved! Thank you based Hexbear mods!

https://hexbear.net/comment/4775700

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Well, your comments have me feeling a lot more optimistic about things. I look forward to the rewritten rule. As is, it made me worry that a large part of the dunk tank would be banned (when I feel like there's a fairly small amount of bait/nonsense to be removed).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

would a top level comment that clarifies things be recommended by mods? cuz i think the rule changes are alright i am just pretty confused since i might not know if a specific individual is being dunked on or an ideology or smth

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Yea, I'm a bit new to hexbear (well I'm at 9 months so however you want to count that), and I thought it was always that way, with a mix of posts.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

what is the dunk tank for now. i wasnt paying attention

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

ty

my thoughts:

Notability? Isn't this just going to restrict posts to the most obvious Twitter screenshots?

Please go all the way and require people to perform a full media criticism of an article then, for heavens' sake. There are people here who do epic dunk comments like that in the news mega. This seems odd.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Isn't this just going to restrict posts to the most obvious Twitter screenshots?

That's my issue with it too. I can kind of get on board with removing "low effort" posts (he brings up 0 like YouTube comments), if that's an issue. As written it seems like it would remove a lot of good posts though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

explicitly ban youtube comments easy

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

/c/realbadposting

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

I don't really know how much work modding is (having never done it on a platform like this), but I'd give it a shot if you needed me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago