[-] nieceandtows@programming.dev 44 points 23 hours ago

At what point are humans optional in the end to end lifecycle?

[-] nieceandtows@programming.dev 3 points 23 hours ago

The pendulum as to swing all the way before it swings the other way.

[-] nieceandtows@programming.dev 4 points 23 hours ago

What's the most realistic end of the war and what's the best case scenario? Any thoughts?

[-] nieceandtows@programming.dev 13 points 1 day ago

it has to drizzle before it rains

[-] nieceandtows@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago

So that's how you manifest your own destiny...

[-] nieceandtows@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

I think it's not AI. I still have one or two suspects (like the bottom left and top right wearing the same dress, but the big yellow flower on the bottom one has two leaves coming out, but the top one seems to have one leaf and one stem coming out, but it could also just be a wrinkle), but for the most part, the details seem to be too consistent to be AI

[-] nieceandtows@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

yeah you're right about the rainbow and the dress.

[-] nieceandtows@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago

it’s actually my 10yo daughter who sent me this image and asked me if it’s AI. I’m teaching her to be on the lookout for ai generated images so that she can stay vigilant and not fall for scams using ai images to create a narrative.

[-] nieceandtows@programming.dev 4 points 5 days ago

Yeah it's actually my 10yo daughter who sent me this image and asked me if it's AI. I'm teaching her to be on the lookout for ai generated images so that she can stay vigilant and not fall for scams using ai images to create a narrative.

[-] nieceandtows@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I think the one behind the flower is the armpit. The thumb on the other hand might be holding the stem on he other side of he index finger. That said, that seems to be a weird extra strip of clothing on the hand behind the flower

8
34

30
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by nieceandtows@programming.dev to c/gardening@lemmy.world

209
54
8

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/51247328

I use speckit, and while I like the spec/clarify/plan/task/analyze/implement loop (although it can get a bit overwhelming at times), I don't like that I have to start with writing a spec and implement it to begin with. I am looking for a more of a design phase before the spec phase, where I can talk about the overall application architecture, and then start writing specs for implementing pieces of it.

For instance, let's say I want to build a github repo provisioner that 1. creates repos with desired setup, and 2. bulk edit repos with secret updates, yaml updates, etc. I don't want to build both the features at the beginning. I want to first build only the create portion, and then do the bulk edit feature later on. With speckit, I can do this by only telling it to create the spec for the build portion, but later if I want to build the bulk edit portion, the whole application might need to be changed in important places, because it wasn't a 'planned' feature when it was first designed. I want instead to have a design phase where I describe and maintain a doc with the whole application, and when I start the spec for the create portion, the agent can understand that this create portion is only part of a bigger application and can design/implement the create portion accordingly.

Have you come across a situation like this? how do you handle your big applications? Please advise.

16

I use speckit, and while I like the spec/clarify/plan/task/analyze/implement loop (although it can get a bit overwhelming at times), I don't like that I have to start with writing a spec and implement it to begin with. I am looking for a more of a design phase before the spec phase, where I can talk about the overall application architecture, and then start writing specs for implementing pieces of it.

For instance, let's say I want to build a github repo provisioner that 1. creates repos with desired setup, and 2. bulk edit repos with secret updates, yaml updates, etc. I don't want to build both the features at the beginning. I want to first build only the create portion, and then do the bulk edit feature later on. With speckit, I can do this by only telling it to create the spec for the build portion, but later if I want to build the bulk edit portion, the whole application might need to be changed in important places, because it wasn't a 'planned' feature when it was first designed. I want instead to have a design phase where I describe and maintain a doc with the whole application, and when I start the spec for the create portion, the agent can understand that this create portion is only part of a bigger application and can design/implement the create portion accordingly.

Have you come across a situation like this? how do you handle your big applications? Please advise.

2
12
36
Follow the curve (thelemmy.club)
24

Keeps alerting me to empty boxes of 'person' detected with 90+% confidence. So frustrated right now.

24
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by nieceandtows@programming.dev to c/parenting@lemmy.world

She's an only child, and we didn't grow up in America, so she's a bit naive on a lot of things. Her teacher advised us the other day that she's such a sweet girl, but middle school could be brutal for her because of that. What are some wholesome shows I can watch with her that helps her get ready for the world?

EDIT:

This is an astounding collection of shows. Thank you so much! We've started watching Amphibia, and really enjoying it so far. I'll add all these to the backlog. Thanks again!

view more: next ›

nieceandtows

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF