69
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by lwadmin@lemmy.world to c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world

Due to a (now former) admin of the instance anarchist.nexus calling for a member of our team, as well as anyone else they call a zionist, to be murdered, the instance has been defederated.

We're currently discussing how we will proceed with this situation and whether it will affect lemmy.dbzer0.com, which is mostly run by the same admin team, notably excluding the person who used to be on the anarchist.nexus admin team.

We will share further updates once we have them.


Update 2026-04-22 23:25 UTC: anarchist.nexus federation has been reactivated.

We are still discussing this matter, but there is currently no point in keeping anarchist.nexus defederated while lemmy.dbzer0.com is federated.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] wit@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Ya, Kaplan needs to be removed from his admin/mod duties ASAP. He sees lemmy.world has his personal and private property and thinks he can do whatever he wishes. That is not what a community is about.

He is the typical reddit mod that we all hate. That is one of the reasons why we are on lemmy rather than on reddit. And yet, we are letting it happen here again? Fuck no. We need to be on the look out and stop such things as soon as possible, before they become too big to deal with.

[-] Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com 121 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hey there, Kaplan.

So, this is quite clearly now just a witch hunt by you.

For anyone else who is curious, this is what happened.

A user by the name of Luminous was an admin on Anarchist.nexus. They banned MrKaplan from a community for posting zionist apologia. Luminous also had 'Kill all Zionists' as their display name. MrKaplan took this as a personal death threat. Instead of speaking with any other admin from Anarchist.nexus and reporting the behavior, MrKaplan instantly defederated from Anarchist.nexus.

In the next couple of days, Kaplan messaged other users/admins of Lemmy about the defederation and suggested defederation to others as well.

It was then posted about in the Piefed matrix channel. This led to PugJesus, someone who I abhor, actually saying something I agree with.

The conversation moves elsewhere. One bit of input that stands out is this. It will become important in a second.

In basically every situation, Kaplan is told that they're wrong or overreacting but Kaplan cannot see past the 'death threat' to their own mistake.

So, I messaged Kaplan. Conversation goes on and one thing is made clear

Kaplan never spoke with anyone and ran all of this off of an assumption. There was inconsistencies in how the different people felt because they were different people and not one organism. What was individuality instead came off as obliviousness and Kaplan took it personaly. See what I mean by it became important? Kaplan is talking about a 'lack of moderation' over something that Kaplan literally never reported or talked to anyone about and instead just made assumptions over.

@Ruud@lemmy.world, this is what you're backing. You went out of your way to make an instance that wasn't going to be reddit and you went ahead and re-created Spez, an admin who personally takes out their own feelings on anyone that they don't like and is trying to control the narrative of the entirety of the fediverse.

Friendly reminder to everyone. Check back a couple of months ago on this community and look at the post about JordanLund. A moderator who was openly lying to the admins in public but the admins took weeks to decide to do literally nothing. But a single user on another instance meant that MrKaplan was able to defederate it all.

This behavior from Kaplan is, quite literally, the reason that I left lemmy.world.

Don't believe me? Here's the last message I sent Kaplan during the Jordan garbage.

Funny. Jordan requires a ton of deliberation, reasons in the TOS, and you're all 'working on it' but a single user says something you don't like so instant defederation?

Edit: Quick note but every other post on this community has been featured. This one isn't. So you're making an announcement but you're not really announcing it. Any response to this, Kaplan?

Edit 2: Kaplan is just blatantly lying. As demonstrated above, Kaplan has literally zero evidence of this claim other than things "feeling odd".

Edit 3: Serinus joined the thread 15 minutes ago and now a number of my comments are being removed for 'misinformation' despite the comment above proving them to be categorically true.

[-] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

you unilaterally defederated from Anarchist.nexus days ago.

this bears repeating, this announcement comes days after, presumably when they realised that woops i guess we also have users that might care about this?

This is what a managerial outlook, "making tough decisions about the future of this project" looks like.

[-] Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 week ago

Correct.

The action for defederation was taken days ago and the community was not notified at all. That was the problem PugJesus actually had. Kaplan just treating this like their own personal fiefdom.

[-] IntrovertTurtle@lemmy.zip 40 points 1 week ago

This is the best write-up about the drama that I've seen in this thread. Beautiful work as always Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 120 points 2 weeks ago

From what I saw, the 'call to murder' was someone having kill all zionists in their username, and that only makes sense as a real call to violence if we're supposed to take everyone's username seriously and literally. That would be a very weird world to be in, as then we'd have to accept that we're reading posts written by Star Trek characters come to life, inanimate objects, and various bodily fluids. Without evidence of something worth taking more seriously, at best this looks like the admin team doing something silly, and obviously certain groups of Lemmy users will interpret it less charitably and as the LW admin team being pro-genocide. Neither is a good look.

[-] moderatecentrist@feddit.uk 1 points 6 days ago

I don't agree. I don't think people should have usernames of the form "kill all [certain type of people]".

If someone condemns Israel's actions against Palestinians then okay. But I don't think it's right to call for the deaths of people you disagree with. Even the worst criminals should arguably not be killed with the death penalty, but instead imprisoned for life.

[-] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

During an active military conflict, killing isn't applying the death penalty just for disagreeing with someone, it's typically the only remotely viable way to stop them committing whatever act they're in the middle of. When that act is genocide, killing them is almost universally the only moral action as anything else, even if it still stopped them, would take longer and in doing so let more genocide happen.

If they've been stopped by other means, e.g. economic sanctions make genocide too expensive to continue, then many genocidal acts carry the death penalty under international law. That's ethically dubious, but it's far from the biggest problem with anti-genocide law given that it's blatently not actually preventing genocide. If the username were just apply international law to zionists, then it'd still be promoting killing people.

It's also misleading to reduce zionists to certain type of people, as it conjoures up ideas based on inherent identity that are obviously bad to persecute before more directly comparable types of people like murder enthusiasts actively committing murders and refusing to stop despite pressure to. No reasonable person would say armed police were unjustified in shooting someone who was stabbing someone else after they'd been already told to drop their weapon. Not all zionists are actively killing people, but they are all calling for it to be allowed to continue, otherwise they inherently wouldn't be zionists.

[-] moderatecentrist@feddit.uk 1 points 5 days ago

Surely it isn't necessarily true that every single zionist supports bombing Gaza. "Zionist" apparently means:

someone who belongs to or supports a political movement that had as its original aim the creation of a country for Jewish people, and that now supports the state of Israel

Surely some people within that definition support the existence of Palestine alongside Israel, and they oppose any harm done to Palestinian civilians. For example there is an Israeli charity, B'Tselem, which apparently supports Palestinian rights, although I don't know much about them.

[-] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Supporting the state of Israel, at a time when it is actively committing a genocide, is supporting the genocide. Genocide should be a red line that forces people to stop supporting its perpetrators, and anyone who doesn't withdraw support once a genocide starts must be, on some level, okay with it.

Existing within a state doesn't automatically imply support for it. Most people have at least something they want their state to stop doing, and that can and does include existing. It's hard to say that a charity issuing statements that Israel is an "apartheid regime", "no longer a democracy" and "committing genocide" supports the state of Israel.

There are also plenty of people who, if asked, would say they support the state of Israel, but wouldn't support genocide, and not see that as contradictory because they're under the impression that Israel isn't committing a genocide. What they're supporting isn't the state of Israel, it's a hypothetical alternative state of Israel that doesn't exist. If (pretending for a moment that the USS Enterprise wasn't decommissioned in 2017 and was currently in the Strait of Hormuz) someone who mistakenly believed the United Federation of Planets was real expressed support after hearing in the news that the USS Enterprise had fired on other ships, it'd be most reasonable to just ignore them rather than assuming their opinion of their imaginary state was relevant to what their opinion of the real United States would be.

[-] moderatecentrist@feddit.uk 3 points 4 days ago

There are probably people who support the existence of Israel without supporting what Bibi and his government have done. Opposition politicians in Israel, for example.

Surely in any country there will be people (such as opposition politicians and activists) who oppose the current government's actions, without wanting the state itself to be dissolved. Even in very authoritarian countries like North Korea there might be such people, although of course they would have to keep their views private, due to near-certain persecution otherwise.

[-] Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world 81 points 2 weeks ago

My handle is serious. Deadly serious.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Yliaster@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago

Surprise surprise Lemmy isn't entirely different from Reddit in that:

  • It kills a community over the name of one user (yes I'm aware it was an admin)
  • Said admin had beef with this user, which they conveniently left out in their post description
  • It's got shameless hypocrisy too where calls to death from zionism is acceptable but not the other way around

For the record, I am not for calling anyone's death as that's not my thing, but have some consistency hypocrites. Smh.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[-] fireweed@lemmy.world 90 points 2 weeks ago

I am confused. If the admin in question is no longer an admin, what's the need for defederation?

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 85 points 2 weeks ago

the tea is all over yepowertrippinbastards, and i gotta say i agree with the prevailing sentiment. mrkaplan is making a bad move, but its indicative of a pattern of politically based moderation that pervades .world.

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 81 points 1 week ago

This is honestly pathetic. If the admins want to have an argument at least leave everyone else out of it. Defederation should be an absolute last resort not your first port of call when someone disagrees with you

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 79 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 79 points 2 weeks ago

Okay, but was the person accused a Zionist? If so, why not eject/defederate/ultimatum them instead?

I'd prefer a federation of rabid anti-Zionists than one of Zionists. It's the Nazi bar analogy, because EVERYONE should be against Genocide.

load more comments (28 replies)
[-] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 77 points 1 week ago

Have you considered raising this with the admin team before defederating?? Or with your userbase?? I don't wanna hear shit about hexbear is aUtHoRiTaRiAaAaAn when they have a vote before defederation instead of just throwing a tantrum and reflexively defederating a whole-ass instance because of personal drama between two admins.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] testauser1@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago

Have you considered not being Zionists

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 64 points 2 weeks ago

Guess I need to move instances

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip 61 points 2 weeks ago

Just so I get this right, you defederated an entire instance because a singular user has lost it and called for violence?

load more comments (33 replies)
[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 58 points 1 week ago

Lol, The FAF takes weeks of deliberation, and a public vote to defederate feddit.org and we still get shit about being "authoritarians" or "manipulative". L.W. just YOLO defederated an anarchist instance on the flimsiest excuse and...crickets.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 57 points 2 weeks ago

So wait you're just defeterating an entire instance just because the arch Zionist of this instance is having a bitch fit? I'd rather just get rid of him. Can we do that instead?

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 57 points 1 week ago

We're currently discussing how we will proceed with this situation

Block the mod on your personal list, don't defederate?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mlg@lemmy.world 54 points 2 weeks ago

Oh no someone said something controversial on the internet, what ever will we do?

Remember when world nuked the piracy community lol.

Unless that instance is causing brigading, what's the point of banning over a former admin with such a tame username.

[-] phdeeznuts@mander.xyz 41 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The Lemmy.world team are Zionists. It is a direct death threat against them. We all know internet names are legitimate. MrKaplan has had to go into hiding due to fear for his life.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 week ago

Lemmy.world not beating the allegations of harboring Zionists

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rainwall@piefed.social 50 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Having issues with a genocidal state is one thing, calling for a specific person to be murdered is another.

Can you post the comment where they called for a specific person to be murdered? A link would be great, but even a copy/paste would do well.

load more comments (29 replies)
[-] Cease@mander.xyz 49 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Honestly a great move from the .world admins to prevent themselves from becoming too big, and I applaud their effort to piss everyone off and make them leave for more community oriented instances lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Is there an instance policy that affects dot world?

Or is it just a personal issue against one person?

I would argue that you should just ban THAT PERSON from your instance. Trying to hurt a whole instance and the whole federation concept over one person being rude on internet feels unreasonable.

People said "doesn't matter which instance you land on when you sign in", trying to lure people into the fediverse simplifying the sign in process. But with these kinds of behaviors is a BIG ISSUE which instance do you choose, making you create multiple accounts on a fragmented fediverse, for things that have nothing to do with you.

How many migrations could normal people who just want to have a social media place to have fun endure? One? Two? Three? After that I would guess many people would give up and just move away from the fediverse because they just have to keep making different accounts to interact with the whole place.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago

Honestly, with comments in this thread being removed by mods and the delays and prevarifications over this defederation, I'm starting to think LW is run by children.

Do better.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] BoJackHorseman@lemmy.today 43 points 2 weeks ago

It's only ok when Zionists murder other people, not the other way round.

load more comments (28 replies)
[-] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 1 week ago

We are still discussing this matter, but there is currently no point in keeping anarchist.nexus defederated while lemmy.dbzer0.com is federated

This honestly reads like a threat of escalation more than anything else

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] zikzak025@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

After getting a better look at the background, this seems like a misstep.

Agreed that Luminous was not exhibiting behavior that seemed becoming of an admin (borrowing the terms of the db0 folks, they appear to be a bit of a "shit stirrer") but it doesn't look like there was any direct call to violence towards Kaplan, as this whole debacle seems to imply.

Luminous is no longer an admin, so I don't see why the defederation of anarchist.nexus needs to continue (given that its initial justification is already questionable). The main takeaway is that the admin team of Lemmy.world (or maybe just Kaplan, I don't know who all the admins are) seem to be taking criticism of Zionism personally...which to me sounds easily solved by simply not being Zionists.

So, if the LW team are not Zionists, I don't see why they shouldn't just come out and say so, but then I guess I don't see any other reason why someone would take a "death to Zionists" tagline personally.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago

I think the admins should get over it. Defederating anyone with opposing views is not helping anyone. I especially don't expect this from World. This is not a real threat and you know it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 week ago

wow. how about banning zionists instead?

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Vicinus@piefed.zip 39 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

What action will be taken against rogue admins on world?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TheShadow277@slrpnk.net 37 points 2 weeks ago

this is a bit embarrassing

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ
this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
69 points (61.2% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

31204 readers
8 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world/

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations ๐Ÿ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS