Unless that human also has a great stick.
Hey man. Twelve is a respectable body count. And they all used protection.
that email is compromised they got bigger issues.
Sending an email doesn't have authentication. I can send an email as literally anyone. It's a very trusting protocol.
Now, if your company is particularly good they might have set up protections from this. But it's not required, and not super common.
Billionaire
Really depends on the ass
I lived within sight of the statue of liberty. Often forgot it was there.
Beach hoodie. They're light and block UV
It really bothers me that we've landed on the phrase clanker when toaster was already available.
The system of nature is destructive, it is finite
It is just as accurate to say the system of nature is creative and infinite. With things constantly evolving into other things and eventually evolving into heat.
You wouldn't say that salt being dissolved in water has destroyed the salt. It simply created saltwater. Your choice about what is destruction and what is creation is arbitrary.
You can prolong its existence
The universe will exist infinitely. Nothing you do changes or destroys that. When you talk about minimizing impact, you're talking about the impact to the environment that's sustains consciousness. If that were to be destroyed, that would be detrimental. You're trying to preserve that.
But even if we nuked the whole planet a hundred times over, the universe is fine. It's just converted some matter to a different form.
My point is, your entire framework is actually working against the universe. The universe is a constant state of change trending towards heat. You're doing your best to minimize that trend towards heat. To keep things from changing. To minimize your impact. That is completely against how the universe functions. But it is completely in favor of keeping consciousness around.
That is ridiculous.
If I want to paint apples, and you want a painting of pears, it's not ableist for me to tell you no. It's not ablist to iterate out your possible options for getting a pear painting either. And that's what he's done.
Now, the entire painting profession might be ableist in that there are certainly barriers to entry. But it's not a single artist's responsibility to fix painting as a whole.
My point is, if you truly think the situation with raync is ableist, help develop tools so that more people can program. Enable people to program. Don't just shout down the guy who said "go program". That doesn't help.
Please. Men vastly outnumber women in the legislature. If those numbers flipped there would be DRASTIC change.
surewhynotlem
0 post score0 comment score
It seems like a good idea but we'll never know unless we try