566
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
453
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
407
New Filth (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
459
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
425
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
457
Remorse (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
216
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

713
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
286
Orb of Light (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
572
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 68 points 9 months ago

Remember that time when we elected a literal idiot to be president and a million Americans died because of how fucking stupid he was?

[-] [email protected] 61 points 9 months ago

New poll just dropped showing him down by 3 in Iowa(!) I hope he never gets another good night's sleep as long as he lives.

[-] [email protected] 265 points 9 months ago

I don't want to rock the boat or anything, but does anybody else think that maybe we need just a tiny bit of judicial reform? It seems to me like there's an awful lot of people doing an awful lot of criming and our judicial system is apparently not that interested about stopping them until after the next election. And there's always a next election.

So far.

418
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
874
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 145 points 1 year ago

Just pack the goddamn court. There's ONE conservative justice on the Supreme Court who was appointed by a president who came to power having received more votes than his opponent, and that's Clarence Thomas, the man whose loyalties can be bought with a luxury vacation and whose wife aided and abetted insurrectionist traitors.

The ENTIRE conservative wing of the Supreme Court is illegitimate. Every single one of them. And you know what? Thanks to the GOP, it only takes 50 votes to approve a supreme court justice. It used to be sixty, but they changed the rules so they could more conveniently destroy America.

[-] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago

That's . . . not what cute means.

[-] [email protected] 71 points 1 year ago

What does it mean when the highest court in your ostensible democracy is this obviously compromised?

I mean morally it's obvious. Their judgements are invalid. Useless. Feel free to ignore anything they say if you can get away with it. But unless we're down for anarchy, what means do we have to deal with this? Legally the president can pack the court. So long as he can get the senate to go along. But he doesn't seem to want to, and there are no viable alternatives to the president we have. Not yet, anyway.

So here we are. A 'democracy' with a supreme court that's openly compromised, if not outright corrupt. Nobody's running on a 'maybe the supreme court shouldn't be filled with 18th century ideologues and grifters' platform. Nobody's talking about upside down flags and RVs on the major networks.

So what do?

[-] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago

Before you criticize anybody, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

[-] [email protected] 117 points 1 year ago

Eminent domain the final mile and be done with it. These companies have no business holding our national infrastructure hostage.

[-] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago

What kind of world do we live in when a fundamentalist authoritarian lunatic can't even successfully crowdfund his human trafficking operation?

[-] [email protected] 61 points 2 years ago

How dare you disrespect Gurney Halleck like that?

[-] [email protected] 83 points 2 years ago

I have a lot of trouble understanding how the NTSB (or whoever's ostensibly in charge of vetting tech like this) is allowing these not-quite self driving cars on the road. The technology doesn't seem mature enough to be safe yet, and as far as I can tell, nobody seems to have the authority or be willing to use that authority to make manufacturers step back until they can prove their systems can be integrated safely into traffic.

view more: next ›

daikiki

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago